Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Denied/February 2009

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 03

[edit]

User:Raiku Lucifer Samiyaza

[edit]
Could really use it, being a rollbacker. Raiku Lucifer Samiyaza 23:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Your account creation logs show you don't participate in requested accounts. See WP:ACC. Rollback has nothing to do with this tool, and if you think it does, you misunderstand its purpose. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 23:24, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kremzeek!

[edit]
Good Editor. 98.218.94.104 (talk) 01:51, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done You can't nominate other people for rollback. Well, you supposedly can, with the consent of the other party, but there's no need. If the editor wants rollback, please direct them to this page. However, I'd currently decline it, because only 30-or-so edits are to the mainspace, equating to 12% of the user's total edits. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 02:05, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bob the Wikipedian

[edit]
Good Edits. I think she/he deserves rollback rights. maybe even adminship. 98.218.94.104 (talk) 02:16, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done As per above. If the user wants it, he can ask for it. Please stop "nominating" users for rollback; they must request it themselves. Thanks, PeterSymonds (talk) 02:19, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Can I nominate myself? I hate being an Old IP. 98.218.94.104 (talk) 02:22, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If you create an account, you may apply providing you meet the general requirements at WP:RBK. It is technically impossible to grant userrights to an anonymous user, sorry. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 02:32, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ha, some random IP nomintated me! I must be getting popular! Thanks for putting a smile in my day! No, I don't want any admin rights, at least not right now. I'm too bogged down with life right now to be entrusted with such rights. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 05:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 06

[edit]

User:Rowdy the Ant

[edit]
I really want to be an admin but I think I need rollback rights first. Rowdy the Ant (talk) 23:30, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done No, you need contributions first. Rollback is not given to users with less than a day's worth of experience. Please contribute some more then this can be revisited. --Deskana (talk) 23:33, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 07

[edit]

User:Peachypoh

[edit]
I sometimes patrol the recent changes list, but find it very tedious to undo revisions individually. Peachypoh (talk) 02:56, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. Sorry, but you only have about 70 edits. Pleas re-apply in a few weeks with some more experience. Cheers, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 03:02, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 08

[edit]

User:SwirlBoy39

[edit]
I would like account creator in the hopes that I can again become active in creating accounts at ACC without the 6 limit ѕwirlвoy ₪ 14:03, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Re-request when you hit the limit please. The Helpful One 14:17, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 09

[edit]

User:Anhydrobiosis

[edit]
I am reapplying after a month or two of counter vandalism work. I need the right to use Huggle. A Patriotic Person. You'll see me in History someday. 17:02, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This concerns me. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 17:15, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done per the issues discussed at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive501#Anhydrobiosis and others. The first reversion I chose at random from your recent contribs was you undoing a good-faith IP edit (those cereals seem to have existed [1]). This is also troubling. Oren0 (talk) 02:31, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:SO Empire

[edit]
Vandalism of Lowkey's wikipedia page, Management (SO Empire) want to undo vandalism when it happens. SO Empire (talk) 10:38, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done 2 edits doesn't yet show enough experience. Please re-apply in a week or two when you have more experience on Wikipedia. Thanks, and welcome. PeterSymonds (talk) 10:56, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 13

[edit]

User:Saebjorn

[edit]
I want to help revert pages and make Wikipedia a more successful knowledge sharing resource. Saebjorn (talk) 02:23, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. Sorry, but you only have 21 edits. Please re-apply in a few weeks once you have some more experience. Cheers, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 02:27, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Saddy Dumpington

[edit]
I mostly revert vandalism, and this would be very helpful for reverting multiple edits of vandalism by the same user. Saddy Dumpington (talk) 16:43, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. Sorry, but you only have 86 edits. Please re-apply in a few weeks once you have some more experience. Cheers, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 17:04, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Funnily enough, I just came across this user because they reverted some vandalism on a page that I watch. I looked through their reverts and couldn't find anything wrong. Why wait a few weeks? Acalamari 17:53, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the user has only been editing actively for a day, and considering that rollback is a fairly powerful tool, I'd just like to see some more contributions to base my assessment off of. I suppose a week or two would suffice, but I usually like to see at least three weeks of experience. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 17:59, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 14

[edit]

User:Mm11

[edit]
I have been doing lot of vandal related edits and this tool will be useful for me Mm11 (talk) 11:57, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done As far as I can see you do have nearly no experience in reverting vandalism. I may recommend using tools like Twinkle or undo in order to gain some experience in this area before reapplying. — Aitias // discussion 12:06, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Contributions look good to me. Rowdy the Ant (talk) 16:07, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Rowdy the Ant

[edit]
It's been a week. Rowdy the Ant (talk) 15:35, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
During which you created the request Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Bob the Wikpedian for a non-existent account. —C.Fred (talk) 15:45, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'll correct the spelling later. Rowdy the Ant (talk) 15:51, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Insufficient edit history over the past week to demonstrate knowledge of how to appropriately use the tool. Consider requesting again when you have a solid record of vandalism reversion (you have the undo button available to you still) and have not been inappropriately adding {{block}} tags to users' talk pages. —C.Fred (talk) 15:52, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Check again. And don't call good faith edits Vandelism. Rowdy the Ant (talk) 15:56, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. If you reject again, leave it on my talk page.
FWIW, I endorse C.Fred's decision. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 16:17, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Try again? Rowdy the Ant (talk) 16:24, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 16

[edit]

User:COMPFUNK2

[edit]
I requesting rollback for becuase I've been waiting for PeterSymonds to at least Rollback rights. Please don't bagger me with my faults if you place the { {Not Done} } template. Rowdy the Ant (talk) 02:06, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Are you COMPFUNK2 (talk · contribs)? –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 02:09, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Of coarse not! can't you read? I'm nominating someone so they can rights! I failed sevreral of these permissions and all people can do is bagger my faults! Don't you understand my problem? Rowdy the Ant (talk) 02:16, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Users can nominate themselves if they want to. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 02:29, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If that a done or a not done? Rowdy the Ant (talk) 02:38, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 02:41, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
May I have rollback rights? Rowdy the Ant (talk) 02:51, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No, per your many numerous requests. Improve your experience and it'll be done in a few weeks. In the meantime, please stop asking. Thanks, PeterSymonds (talk) 02:52, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Lier. Rowdy the Ant (talk) 03:09, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop the personal attacks, or you may be blocked. Thank you. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 03:27, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If you make another disruptive edit ([2], [3]) to this page you will be blocked. This is your final warning. — Aitias // discussion 05:43, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 17

[edit]

User:Frosted14

[edit]
I am a long time reader of Wiki and recently interested in fighting vandalism. "Old school" method is cumbersome and I would like to use tools such as Huggle (which requires Rollback) in the fight. Thanks for considering me. Frosted14 (talk) 16:06, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. Sorry, but you only have 50 edits, of which nearly all were made in the past day. Pleas re-apply in a week or so with some more experience. Regards, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 16:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 18

[edit]

User:Yongzhaorong

[edit]
I am doing a project about e-commerce, and i have found some valued information here, could I have a permission to use those information in my project? Yongzhaorong (talk) 07:31, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done You apparently misunderstand the use of rollback. Please see Wikipedia:Rollback feature for more information about it. It's only useful for quickly reverting vandalism. In answer to your question, yes, you may use Wikipedia content elsewhere, as long as it is applicable and compliant with GFDL. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 14:25, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 19

[edit]

User:Al Wiseman

[edit]
Unfortunately, For reasons I would not like to discuss, I've had to create a new account, so it shows almost no contributions for me, and, as I have always, I want to be an admin. Having said that, helping the site by undoing vandalism seems like a great place to restart. I've had experience fighting vandalism and I see this a better way to fight it.

The man, ALW (talk) 21:34, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done This is extremely worrying. — Aitias // discussion 21:36, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Haha, Im sorry, do you want me to change it or something, it's somewhat of a catchphrase of mine -- The man, ALW (talk) 21:39, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No, it's up to you whether you want to change that. You can not be granted rollback at this point anyway, as there is no evidence of experience in reverting vandalism at all. Perhaps using tools like WP:TW before reapplying is a good idea. — Aitias // discussion 21:46, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, sir. Also thanks for the quick response :) -- The man, ALW (talk) 21:48, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome! :) — Aitias // discussion 21:52, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Iner22

[edit]
I've been against vandalism for a while now, but have been unable to revert it before an administrator has already reverted it and warned the user. Iner22 (talk) 21:43, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done I'm sorry but I see no evidence of use of WP:UNDO or similar so we can see how you manage vandalism. Please feel free to ask soon, when you have more experience on this wiki with vandal fighting. Pedro :  Chat  21:48, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 21

[edit]

User:Juancdg

[edit]
Most articles that I watch, are vandalized quickly, and with the help of this "tool", I can help to prevent that. Juan D. (talk) 04:36, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. Sorry, but you have very little vandal-fighting experience. I suggest using the undo feature and Twinkle for a while. Cheers, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 04:38, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I use Internet Explorer, so Twinkle is not supported. I will continue using the UNDO feature anyway. --Juan D. (talk) 05:02, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, there are plenty of other anti-vandal tools. See Wikipedia:CVU#Tools. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 05:04, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Tried to use Twinkle but with no sucess (page error). I will use UNDO for now. --Juan D. (talk) 05:40, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:macromonkey

[edit]
I have decided to take a greater role in fighting vandalism, so just today i enabled twinkle, to aid me in doing so. This is a useful tool, although when i was browsing the site and discover rollback rights, I knew that it would assist me greatly Macromonkey (talk) 23:33, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. Sorry, but your recent edit warring leaves me quite concerned. Also, you have very little experience in vandal-fighting. Cheers, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 23:39, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 22

[edit]

User:Djcam

[edit]
Tool will help in the removal of vandalism Djcam (talk) 18:55, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done You're very new and have only 30 or so edits. Stick around for 1-2 weeks and stick to WP:RBK and I'll happily grant it. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 19:00, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 23

[edit]

February 24

[edit]

User:Philly jawn

[edit]
I would like to be able to use rollback to combat vandalism. Thanks Philly jawn (talk) 03:02, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. Sorry, but you have little or no vandal-fighting experience. Please use WP:UNDO or WP:TWINKLE for a while and re-apply in a week or two. Cheers, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 03:09, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Josemanimala

[edit]
I want to help stop vandalism and use huggle to do that. Huggle needs Rollback permission. It will make my work faster. Jose M Manimala 15:14, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 Not done You do not have enough contributions at this time to provide us with enough evidence of anti-vandalism work. Please continue using the undo button and re-request the flag in a few weeks. Tiptoety talk 15:32, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Denied/February_2009&oldid=1085550237"