Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 January 9
< January 8 | January 10 > |
---|
January 9
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:10, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:ATMT Live.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Own work is claimed, but in the bottom right there's a different name and a website. multichill (talk) 11:44, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:10, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Qaboos Word Rgotc.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Not enough information to verify the terms of Oman law makes this PD. Who wrote the letter and when etc. MGA73 (talk) 13:13, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:10, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Not enough information to verify the terms of Oman law makes this PD. Who created the logo originally and when etc. MGA73 (talk) 13:15, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:10, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- All uploads by User:Neuenschwander are hereby nominated. They are taken with different cameras and there is no good source provided. Also many of the photos are derivative works. The files are:
- File:Arboleda Yazmany with art.jpg
- File:Artist yazmany arboleda .jpg
- File:Artist yazmany arboleda 3.jpg
- File:Artist yazmany arboleda.jpg
- File:Artist yazmany arboleda2.jpg
- File:Artist yazmany in london.jpg
- File:ISSEY MIYAKE NYC yazmany arboleda.JPG
- File:New vitruvians exhibit yazmany.jpg
- File:New Vitruvians Yazmany Arboleda.jpg
- File:Yazmany & anish 1.jpg
- File:Yazmany & anish 2.jpg
- File:Yazmany arboleda anavailablespace 09.jpg
- File:Yazmany arboleda anavailablespace 11.jpg
- File:Yazmany arboleda anavailablespace 17.jpg
- File:Yazmany arboleda anavailablespace 20.jpg
- File:Yazmany arboleda art directors club.JPG
- File:Yazmany arboleda art installation london.jpg
- File:Yazmany arboleda art installation.JPG
- File:Yazmany arboleda exhibit art directors club.JPG
- File:Yazmany arboleda installation nyc.JPG
- File:Yazmany arboleda issey miyake exhibit.JPG
- File:Yazmany arboleda keller gates project.JPG
- File:Yazmany arboleda london exhibit.jpg
- File:Yazmany arboleda vitruvians london 1.jpg
- File:Yazmany Art vitruvians london 4.jpg
- File:YAZMANY INSTALLATION ADC 2008.JPG
Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 13:35, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Feydey (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:53, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sejjil 2 test launch.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- I see a more complete version of this image in many website, e.g. http://www.defencetalk.com/pictures/army/p37219-sejil-2-long-range-missile-testiran.html, http://defense-update.com/newscast/0509/news/sejjil_test_200509.html and it looks much more like a PR image than an image owned by someone private. Can the author please explain how he is the owner? Muhandes (talk) 13:59, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:10, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Lightbulb-life.svg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Reffered given the sourcing, I thought EU copyrights were author+70? meaning a 1945 work wouldn't nessacrily have expired yet. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:05, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Dutch Auteursrecht mentions 70 years from the death of the author. Therefore it may or may not be expired as I can't find who actually wrote it. Jarkeld (talk) 14:20, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:10, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- There is no sign of a permission so this is most likely not a free file. MGA73 (talk) 16:48, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Tabercil (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:55, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Tucson Shooting.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Uploader states on his user page that he lives in Bucharest, Romania. Photo is of a recent shooting in Arizona. The image also lacks camera metadata. Kelly hi! 16:54, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Just a side note but the user also has a history of uploading non-free images - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 17:01, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I reverted my clean up of the templates, and concur with the nominator. KimChee (talk) 21:43, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: The editors in commons tracked down the origin of the file to here. KimChee (talk) 22:41, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:10, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Chicagoland.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- 2 Tineye matches.... Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:03, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:10, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:KumiKodaatConcert.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Uploaded as an album cover but is not sourced. Uploader added it to an article Kumi Koda discography with the caption Kumi Koda at one of her concerts so unlikely to be an album cover and possibly just copied from [1] MilborneOne (talk) 19:36, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:10, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- There is not much information about this angel so it may not be free. It looks like some sort of art and that makes it a derivative work. We need more information to verify that this is not a copyvio. MGA73 (talk) 21:34, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:10, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The uploader previously claimed this work belonged to the Tbilisi State Academy of Arts, and listed a name which does not match their username as the author. They are now claiming that it is their own work. J Milburn (talk) 21:44, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The uploaded refuses to discuss this or any other images they uploaded so I have serious doubts they own the rights. --Muhandes (talk) 23:08, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note that the uploader himself has changed the source and no longer claims this to be their own work. --Muhandes (talk) 18:28, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: per nom. This uploader appears to be unreliable and makes data changes depending on how their images are tagged. Fiel has no permission based on original upload copyright data. ww2censor (talk) 06:03, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: closed as moot. FFD has a shorter waiting period than PUF, and as such, these files were deleted under that process, where it was determined to delete all. SchuminWeb (Talk) 21:10, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- No source added. I doubt that uploader took the photo. If it is a screenshot or from internet we need a better source to verify that file is free. MGA73 (talk) 22:26, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I just found out that uploader is blocked. I hereby nominate all uploads by this user for an expection:
- File:Armant(Hermontes)534011718.jpg
- File:Aswan.jpg
- File:Atlas Qanl.jpg
- File:Behara.jpg
- File:Dendara.jpg
- File:Edfo.jpg
- File:Egypt19202.jpg
- File:Elmenia.jpg
- File:Giza.jpg
- File:H=اسوان.jpg
- File:Kafr el.jpg
- File:Kenaa.jpg
- File:Loweregypt.jpg
- File:Loxor.jpg
- File:Mrs.Eglal Bahgat.JPG
- File:Qaou-el-Kebyreh.jpg
- File:Qena.jpg
- File:Quenna.jpg
- File:Sharqeia.jpg
- File:أسيوط.jpg
- File:الاقصر.jpg
- File:البحيرة.jpg
- File:الشرقية.jpg
- File:الفيوم وبني سويف.jpg
- File:المنيا.jpg
- File:سوهاج.jpg
- File:معمارى.jpg
- File:وجه بحري.jpg
Before I noticed the block and the general problem I also started this DR but I think it would be good to keep discussion at one place. I suggest here.
Thank you. --MGA73 (talk) 22:37, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:10, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Marion davis.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Owning a photo is not (always) the same as having the copyright for it. We need to know who took it, when and why uploader has the copyright. MGA73 (talk) 22:53, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- A slightly larger version is at [2], including the writing/signature in the corner. Not sure of the date of the website but the page says Copyright ©2000 Jazz Professional. All Rights Reserved. They may not be the original source. MilborneOne (talk) 19:59, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:10, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bpratt.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The concern is the inclusion of the Seal desgin ,No contest as to it being uploaders work Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:27, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.