Wikipedia:Peer review/Wikipedia/archive8

Wikipedia

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I'd like to get this article back to FA at some point- after nominating already and getting a quick fail, it seems to consensus was that a peer review would be best, so here I am!

Thanks, MyCatIsAChonk (talk) 13:34, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A good place to start would be fixing the problems brought up in the FAC, that is, excessive length, unreliable sources, and lack of verifiability (a page number must be provided for all book citations). (t · c) buidhe 11:38, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This tool might be helpful for detecting some of the unreliable sources, especially the self-published unreliable ones from Wikinews, the Wikiversity, and Wikipedia itself. Sourcing is my biggest concern, and there appears to a concerning focus on self-published and news sources rather than academic ones. The Night Watch (talk) 20:36, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]