Wikipedia:Peer review/Eluru/archive2
Appearance
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion is closed. |
I’m eager to see what additional changes could be made to qualify it for a Good Article status
Thanks, I.Mahesh (talk) 16:13, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- I don't normally do these reviews, so may have the formatting wrong, but I was specifically invited. Although I have made 83 edits to the page, most were grammar/unsourced/Indic script edits. so have I limited my comments to such matters, as I know relatively little about Eluru, so do not know whether the content is fair and balanced.
I have changed some spellings (center, neighbor) as WP:ENGVAR there are probably more.
I corrected 2 references, to refer to the actual sources, and removed references citing IMDB (not a reliable source as WP:IMDB) and Banglapedia. There are also a number of WP:RAJ sources, which are generally not considered reliable.
The notable people section needs clarifying; if you want to use a table, (which seems unnecessary to me), it should be in order of LAST name, be sortable, and not largely repeat the prose section immediately above it. It also includes the hidden text "Omit any entries lacking proper references." which was not being followed, even before I deleted the IMDB references.
There are multiple repeated wikilinks WP:OVERLINKING and some misused bold. Good luck - Arjayay (talk) 10:55, 18 August 2024 (UTC)- @Arjayay Hello, Thanks for the inputs, I’ve addressed the over-linking issue and reformatted the notable people section to include only those with Wikipedia articles. I.Mahesh (talk) 12:55, 18 August 2024 (UTC)