Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject New Zealand/Law task force

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nau mai, haere mai to the WikiProject New Zealand Law task force. The aim of this sub-project is to improve the coverage of New Zealand law-related articles.

Scope

[edit]

The scope of this sub-project covers all New Zealand law-related topics, for example:

However, this does not include:

If you are in doubt whether something falls under the scope of this sub-project, just ask.

Task force membership

[edit]
Flag of New ZealandThis user is a participant in
WikiProject
NZ Law task force
.
Justice icon

Joining the task force

[edit]

To join the task force, place the following userbox on your userpage:

{{User WikiProject New Zealand/Law task force}}

Task force participants

[edit]

Category:WikiProject New Zealand law task force participants shows the membership of the task force.

Article alerts

[edit]

Note that you can watchlist these alerts:

Peer reviews

Tagging, assessment and tasks

[edit]

Any articles that are within the scope of this project should be tagged with the project banners of WikiProject New Zealand and WikiProject Law. You may also find {{WikiProject banner shell}} useful.

For stub class articles, apply one of the three templates at the bottom of the article:

Assessment results in articles are included in the table at the top of this page. Article class and law importance are the aspects to be assessed:

  • Add{{WPNZ}} to the talk pages of articles that come under WikiProject New Zealand's scope.
  • Articles that come under this politics task force's scope should have |law=yes included in the WPNZ template. Importance to this task force can be defined by including and filling in the law-importance= parameter.
  • For example, for a start class article of low importance for WPNZ, but mid importance for the law project, the full template entry would look like this: {{WPNZ|class=start|importance=low|law=yes|law-importance=mid}}. See WP:WikiProject New Zealand/Assessment for more information.
  • Many articles will be needed to be tagged with the law task force parameter.

The table updates itself about daily. It's done by a bot, so if you have just assessed an article, the table itself will not change immediately.

Guidelines for layout of articles

[edit]

Article naming and lead

[edit]

The naming of articles should follow WP:TITLE (Wikipedia article title policy) and WP:NCNZ (New Zealand naming conventions for article titles.

When creating an article for an act use its title, inclusive of the year, (i.e. Abortion Legislation Act 2020). For acts passed before 2000, use its short title instead of its long title, and include its long title in the infobox. Acts passed on or after 2000 do not have long titles. An example introduction of an act in the lead is:

The Abortion Legislation Act 2020 is an Act of Parliament in New Zealand that [succinctly summarise what the act does/covers]. [Additional information summarising article content, if applicable].

When creating an article an article for a court case, use the full court case's title as displayed on NZLII. Ensure that you follow guidance for case names as in the New Zealand Law Style Guide. An example NZ court case good article is Make It 16 Incorporated v Attorney-General, and example introduction of a court case in the lead is:

Make It 16 Incorporated v Attorney-General [2022] NZSC 134 is a decision of the [court name, make sure to wikilink—i.e., Supreme Court of New Zealand] which [explain outcome of case]. [Additional information summarising article content, if applicable].

Infoboxes

[edit]

Acts

[edit]

For legislation after 2000, do not include a long title in the infobox as these have not been used since prior to 2000. However, when adding long titles for pre-2020 legislation ensure that you are using the long title as written in the legislation and not elsewhere.

Infobox legislation example
{{infobox legislation
| short_title    = Local Electoral Act 2001
| legislature    = [[New Zealand Parliament]]
| date_assented  = 29 May 2001
| date_commenced = 1 July 2001
| introduced_by  = [[Sandra Lee-Vercoe]]
| 1st_reading    = 13 December 2000
| 2nd_reading    = 15 May 2001
| committee_whole = 17, 22, 23 May 2001
| 3rd_reading    = 23 May 2001
| related        = [[Local Government Act 2002]]<br/>[[Electoral Act 1993]]
| status         = in force
|italic title=no
}}
Local Electoral Act 2001
New Zealand Parliament
Assented to29 May 2001
Commenced1 July 2001
Legislative history
Introduced bySandra Lee-Vercoe
First reading13 December 2000
Second reading15 May 2001
Committee of the whole17, 22, 23 May 2001
Third reading23 May 2001
Related legislation
Local Government Act 2002
Electoral Act 1993
Status: In force

Court cases

[edit]
Infobox court case example
{{Infobox court case
| name = Make It 16 Incorporated v Attorney-General
| court = [[Supreme Court of New Zealand]]
| date_filed = 
| image = Coat of arms of New Zealand.svg
| date decided = 21 November 2022
| full name = 
| citations = {{Cite NZLII|year=2022|court=NZSC|num=134}}
| judges = [[Helen Winkelmann|Winkelmann]] CJ, [[Susan Glazebrook|Glazebrook]], [[Mark O'Regan|O'Regan]], [[Ellen France|France]] and [[Stephen Kós|Kós]] JJ
| prior actions = {{Cite NZLII|year=2021|court=NZCA|num=681}}<br />{{Cite NZLII|year=2020|court=NZHC|num=2630}}
| subsequent actions = 
| opinions = '''appeal allowed; declarations granted'''<br /><small>(per Winkelmann CJ, Glazebrook, O'Regan and France JJ)</small><br />'''dissent'''<br /> <small>(Kós J)</small>
| Keywords = [[Voting age]], [[Electoral law]], [[New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990]]
}}
Make It 16 Incorporated v Attorney-General
CourtSupreme Court of New Zealand
Decided21 November 2022
Citation[2022] NZSC 134
Case history
Prior actions[2021] NZCA 681
[2020] NZHC 2630
Court membership
Judges sittingWinkelmann CJ, Glazebrook, O'Regan, France and Kós JJ
Case opinions
appeal allowed; declarations granted
(per Winkelmann CJ, Glazebrook, O'Regan and France JJ)
dissent
(Kós J)
Keywords
Voting age, Electoral law, New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990

Article sections

[edit]

Most of the law task force act or court case articles will follow, respectively, the following article structure:

Acts

[edit]
  • Legislative features (explains the act more in depth)
  • Legislative history or History (may consist of a background sub-heading and sub-headings for some/all of its stages in parliament)

Court cases

[edit]
  • Background (may consist of general background, as well as sub-headings for any previous action in a lower court, or related cases)
  • Judgment (consists of in-depth coverage of the court's judgment; use sub-headings if there are multiple opinions)
  • Appeal (consists of in-depth coverage of the subsequent appeals and the judgment of those courts; use sub-headings for multiple appeals and opinions within them)
  • Responses (responses to the court's judgment)

Style guidelines

[edit]

Ensure that you are adhering to WP:MOS. Common style guidelines and additional guidelines with particular relevancy to this task force include:

  • Avoid legalism abbreviations such as Winkelmann CJ or France J. Instead, type out Chief Justice Helen Winkelmann on first reference, and Winkelmann afterwards, or in the case of another justice, Justice Ellen France on first reference, and France afterwards. Remember to change the wiki-links as necessary. (see WP:MOS on unwarranted abbreviations)
  • Avoid using honorifics in prose unless necessary and appropriately use post-nominals. (see MOS:HON and MOS:POSTNOM)
  • Avoid the capitalisation of Act unless within a phrase such as Act of Parliament or Act of the New Zealand Parliament. If Act is being used standalone, it should not be capitalised and instead be act. (see MOS:INSTITUTIONS)
  • When referencing parliament, refrain from using Parliament of New Zealand, and instead use the more common phrase of New Zealand Parliament. Also avoid using Parliament standalone, it should not be capitalised and instead be parliament. (see MOS:INSTITUTIONS)
[edit]

Resources

[edit]

Wikipedia

[edit]

Internet

[edit]