Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Chocolatebareater/Monarchs of England since 1066

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete . ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:10, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Chocolatebareater/Monarchs of England since 1066

recreation of a previously deleted article]. This user responded by placing the article in his sandbox this was blanked and then unblanked, finally reblanked. He was told by ValarianB that he can't have that article in his sandbox because it was previously deleted without any hope of being notable. He's since recreated it in a subpage off his userpage. It probablty took a lot of work and I hate to see it go to waste,but, he doesn't seem to be listening. Ҝ Ø Ƽ Ħ 16:45, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Despite the change in titles, this is the same article as was previously deleted at AFD (a list of monarchs since 1066 with the length of their reigns}. The original reasons for deletion still apply. This would be a WP:REDUNDANTFORK and a speedy WP:G4 as an article. The length of reign information can easily be accommodated in the existing articles if desired (assuming it was not already added after the last AFD - I didn't check). I don't see any chance of this material becoming an article so there is no point in keeping it in userspace. In fact, I think speedy G4 still applies to this. This is not a case of userfication for explicit improvement but of circumvention of deletion policy. Meters (talk) 18:30, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- I have no objection to the user keeping the length of reign information if teh intention is to add that material to an existing article. Meters (talk) 18:32, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:53, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete again. Legacypac (talk) 06:26, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.