The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.
I am editing the article "Garry Owen (actor)" and I found an online source with a lot of information about him. How do I use that information without simply cutting and pasting?
I am editing the article "Garry Owen (actor)" and I found an online source with a lot of information about him. How do I use that information without simply cutting and pasting? This is the source page: https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/77125453/garry-owen
Thanks in advance.
I doubt the insult is directed at me, but it's still troubling to see. Anyone have any suggestions on how to deal with it? I could file an ANI report, but am not sure if it's overreacting. Banedon (talk) 11:53, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Banedon: If you're unsure if something is "ANI-worthy" then you could raise a message to the editor that you think their edit is unacceptably uncivil and you believe they should remove it. In this case it's on your talk page so you have a full right to just remove it anyway should you wish, and you can more than reasonably ask the user to be polite on your TP. What you're doing here is (asking for a second opinion on severity) is also fine, and for a new editor, the HD is probably a reasonable place to ask. Nosebagbear (talk) 12:13, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Banedon: I would agree with you that the insult seems more likely to have been aimed at the person who started that subsection on your page, although the insult was ambiguously worded as to whom they meant by "you". In any event, I'd move to the talk page of JBL and comment that you don't want that type of addition on your Talk Page, as such material is rarely justified anywhere. I think that ANI would be an over-reaction in this case, assuming you've never had trouble from JBL before. Mike Turnbull (talk) 13:41, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Does anyone know of a script that'll somehow mark in an article edit history any accounts that have very few edits to any other article? It would be nice to be able to see at a glance which other editors have edited nothing/almost nothing else. —valereee (talk) 12:15, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Valereee, I can't say that I know of a script that does that, but I felt bad that no one responded to you, so I did. You probably already know, but on Special:RecentChanges you can filter by editors with Newcomers (<10 edits and/or <4 days), Learners (<500 edits and/or <30 days) and Experienced (>500 edits and/or >30 days). This does come in quite handy for someone like me who spends a lot of time skimming through recent changes for vandals. Hope that helps a little! :) Thanks, EDG 543 (message me) 20:29, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Valereee: I did find a script called "histFilter" which adds a button to filter the page's history to only show revisions of blocked users. Here is the code if you want to try it: {{subst:lusc|1=User:The Voidwalker/histFilter.js}} Thanks, EDG 543 (message me) 20:42, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, EDG. I already can see which edits were made by users who are blocked, so I must already have something like that installed! Appreciate all the research! :) —valereee (talk) 17:35, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Valereee A simple solution would be for anyone who flags an article with the COI tag to also start a discussion on the talk page explaining their rationale. Few do this unfortunately, which leaves it up to those of us trying to clean up the article to retrace their steps to figure out who the problematic editor was. TimTempleton(talk)(cont)17:40, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No you cannot query the log for AFD reasons. Usually pages deleted via AFD will say so in the log and provide a link to the AFD
Is it possible to request a query to do this? Looking through the AFD discussions, there is some commonality of issues. As an aside, In all honesty, I had thought the AFD over-zealous in their task - I had no idea how much junk there is. Wakelamp d[@-@]b (talk) 15:15, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome. I clicked through to see my own. The report has links to wiki. I can't view "You do not have permission to view a page's deleted history" even for my own deletions Wakelamp d[@-@]b (talk) 15:15, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If I did understand correctly my reading of the FAQ for the merging of accounts in differents languages, the username that I don't plan to use need to be changed to the one I will use in the future. (Exemple: I change my French username to match the English one).
@Van Quoc Vinh: There are different help pages and you may have read something obsolete. It hasn't been possible to merge accounts for many years. Accounts cannot be renamed to a name which is taken at any wiki. You can use your existing account at other wikis. PrimeHunter (talk) 17:37, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please understand that Wikipedia is not censored for any reason, including religious reasons. There is much content here that is offensive to many religions, and removing it all would leave little behind. There are ways for you to prevent the display of images on your computer, and if you create an account there are ways to prevent seeing images that are described at WP:NOSEE. 331dot (talk) 15:37, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Is there a guide on using whitespace characters when editing Wikipedia? WP:WHITE isn't exactly what I'm looking for (that's about blank space). I'm looking for a guide that answers questions like "Is it appropriate to use character tabulations when editing Wikipedia; if yes, then where?". 85.76.140.34 (talk) 17:34, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Don't use tabs. Our wikitext gets converted to HTML before it's sent to the reader's browser. Tabs and other whitespace are all consolidated by the browser into the equivalent of a single space character by the browser, as part of the way HTML rendering works. If you to wish to present aligned columns, use a table. -Arch dude (talk) 18:58, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, I would prefer to create My First Article™ or take up herding cats as a full-time profession rather than attempt to create a table on WP. If you are utterly determined, Help:Table might not sap your will to live. This is just one example of where Wikipedia manages to turn a simple visual artefact into a woebegone technological disaster, leading to severe hair loss if not permanent mental breakdown. MinorProphet (talk) 19:44, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) @Dr Salvus: IP addresses can change frequently. Blocks will likely ensnare unwitting IP editors to whom the address has been reassigned and also the intended target could move to a new address. A range block will also handicap 'innocent' editors. Eagleash (talk) 00:53, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
