Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Twitter/1

Twitter

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Valid cleanup banners remain on the article, meeting quickfail criteria. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:32, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The last GAR was not opened or closed according to the correct procedure. Meanwhile, there are valid cleanup and update banners on the article, it has ballooned to close to 20,000 words, and the use of primary sources is excessive. This GAR may not be closed until at a minimum the cleanup banners are resolved and removed. (t · c) buidhe 04:25, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [reply]

Procedural discussions

I will note that your first sentence is incorrect buidhe; please see the discussions at WT:GAN and WP:GAPD23 on deprecating individual reassessments, which that reassessment was. Nevertheless, I agree with the rest of your comments. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:40, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AirshipJungleman29 Individual reassessment was not appropriate under the rules at the time because it was not the first reassessment of the article (Talk:Twitter/GA3 was also a reassessment). Nevertheless, I agree it's largely irrelevant. (t · c) buidhe 22:31, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

buidhe I don't believe that there was any prohibition against individual reassessments of an already reassessed article—the closest the old guidelines come to that is "Use the individual reassessment process if you know the article has not been delisted before". Please correct me if I'm wrong. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:37, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

buidhe did you notify any WikiProjects of this reassessment? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:06, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure. I thought the bot did it automatically now, but maybe I'm wrong. (t · c) buidhe 16:28, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As mentioned in the post-nomination pop-up, the bot only notifies nominator, reviewer, and article creator, buidhe. Could you please notify WikiProjects and major contributors with the template in the GAR instructions? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:01, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done (t · c) buidhe 01:09, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.