Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Johor Bahru/1
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result pending
Lead contravenes MOS on citation and filled with superlatives that have zero coverage in the main text. Possible COPYVIO for a night image (Johor Bahru Skyline 20171230.jpg). "Demographics" section is dated to 2010 and contains unsourced sentences. Chunks of "Transportation", "In popular culture" and "Notable people" sections lack citations. hundenvonPG (talk) 21:26, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- If there is a copyvio concern please raise it on Commons. CMD (talk) 01:19, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- I support delisting the article for the time being, given the abovementioned flaws in the article that has not been maintained consistently. I will try to improve the article accordingly based on the advices above. 2001:D08:1A84:B07A:2148:36F7:3EE8:4065 (talk) 04:36, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Appreciate the enthusiasm, but I'm not sure simply stripping sources from the lead is an overall improvement. CMD (talk) 07:15, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, I just made several amendments, can you kindly suggest further improvements if any? 2001:D08:1A84:B07A:2148:36F7:3EE8:4065 (talk) 07:30, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- I moved the citations into the main text with further elaboration, so to match the MOS on citation and cover the leads' content in the main text. 2001:D08:1A84:B07A:2148:36F7:3EE8:4065 (talk) 07:31, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- In that case my apologies for misreading the diff, carry on. I would suggest trimming down the superlatives in the lead a bit more, mostly by rewriting that second paragraph. Perhaps the economy info in the first paragraph should be combined with the economy info in the second paragraph. The history in the lead is also missing something at the start, "further development" from what? CMD (talk) 08:09, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Rectified, thanks so much for the advice! 2001:D08:1A84:B07A:2148:36F7:3EE8:4065 (talk) 08:28, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Appropriate citations have been suitably added to each of the mentioned parts of the articles with sentenced restructured and summarised, contents in leads are covered with details in the main content and COPYVIO images deleted and replaced. 2001:D08:1031:86BB:901B:14AD:9156:DFCF (talk) 12:40, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Rectified, thanks so much for the advice! 2001:D08:1A84:B07A:2148:36F7:3EE8:4065 (talk) 08:28, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- In that case my apologies for misreading the diff, carry on. I would suggest trimming down the superlatives in the lead a bit more, mostly by rewriting that second paragraph. Perhaps the economy info in the first paragraph should be combined with the economy info in the second paragraph. The history in the lead is also missing something at the start, "further development" from what? CMD (talk) 08:09, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Appreciate the enthusiasm, but I'm not sure simply stripping sources from the lead is an overall improvement. CMD (talk) 07:15, 28 December 2024 (UTC)