Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2015 August 22

< August 21	August 23 >

August 22

File:Argentina - Político(regiones).png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Territorial divisions of the Viceroyalty of the Río de la Plata.png

Unused and unusable maps. They both differ from the originals on Commons in showing the Falkland Islands in a different color, but they do not format this change properly (the first map uses blue for the Falklands in the main map, but not the inset; the second uses a badly pasted British flag) and are inaccurate in doing so (the first map simply denotes the regions recognised by Argentina; the second correctly marks the Falklands as being claimed by Montevideo at the time). —innotata 04:12, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Zeppelin6 htm webpage.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Apart from the social media logos at upper right of the first page and the navigation bar on the last pages, the website elements on this screenshot are probably inelgible for copyright. However, even with them removed this PDF, rather than direct scans and the book's text, has no use on Wikipedia or other Wikimedia projects. —innotata 05:18, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yaser said3.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of a fugitive wanted by FBI, but not by the FBI and presumably copyrighted. Another photo of the subject, File:Yaser Abdel Said.png, is used in the subject's article, and I've tagged it as non-free; this one is not needed as a non-free image. —innotata 05:28, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Willie Lamb.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No information on original publication date or source, or on the author. Even if it depicts him in 1928, it could have been created later, as it isn't a photo. This image's copyright status in Canada and US thus cannot be determined, and it is likely to be copyrighted. I assume using this as a non-free image would require some information on provenance. —innotata 05:39, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Iggy Azalea featuring Charli XCX - Fancy (video sample).ogv

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#3b and WP:NFCC#8 also. The clip is enormous in quality and fails the threshold of commercial usage of a non-free content. It also does not signify how it aids the reader in understanding the homage to Clueless —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 13:41, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kesha Rose album cover.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personally created image of no encyclopedic value. Appears to be a derivative work using unlicensed copyrighted images. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:20, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could not a match anywhere except some obscure forum which says that this cover art is fake. As this is not official cover art and doesn't serve any encyclopedic value, I support a strong delete. --189.106.236.134 (talk) 22:59, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Huygens landing01 L.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:14, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image is used under a claim of fair use as it was released by ESA and is considered non-free as the ESA copyright notice says that the images may not be used commercially and may not be modified.

However, 2 color versions of what appears to be the same image, or at least a very similar image, are on Wikimedia Commons and are flagged as public domain: File:Huygens_surface_color.jpg and File:Huygens_surface_color_sr.jpg.

The former comes from JPL and the latter comes from ESA's website. The description of the latter says that the Descent Imager/Spectral Radiometer instrument used to take the photo was being furnished by NASA for Huygens and that the University of Arizona was working under a contract for NASA during the mission.

There are three possibilities at this point: (a) the image is non-commercial fair use and cannot be replaced, (b) the image is non-commercial fair use and is replaceable by the two color images I mentioned, or (c) the image is public domain as it's produced by NASA. Discuss below. 189.106.236.134 (talk) 22:45, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The copyright for such a joint project between one agency that is part of the US government and doesn't claim copyright and two others which do is a hard one. I see that another similar joint project (SOHO) has a copyright terms page for images made through it; is there a website that records the Cassini-Huygens project? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:54, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.