Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Municipalities of Morelos/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 12:25, 11 December 2024 (UTC) [1].[reply]
Municipalities of Morelos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Mattximus (talk) 16:42, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Let's keep it going. Here is one more list of municipalities with a standardized format that now includes 50 (!!) lists of municipalities all around the world. Inspired by these real encyclopedias with consistent formatting and high standard, the project is taking shape. I tried to incorporate changes from previous nominations but I'm sure I've missed some and there can always be improvements. Thanks for your reviews! Mattximus (talk) 16:42, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Steelkamp
[edit]- "The largest municipality by land area is Tlaquiltenango which spans 543.90 km2 (210.00 sq mi), and the smallest is Hueyapan with 19.20 km2 (7.41 sq mi)." I recommend commas be placed like so: "The largest municipality by land area is Tlaquiltenango, which spans 543.90 km2 (210.00 sq mi), and the smallest is Hueyapan, with 19.20 km2 (7.41 sq mi)."
- Done
- Cuautla in the lead should be linked.
- Done
- "responsible for providing all the public services for their constituents". Is it really true that all public services are provided by the municipality. The following sentences seem to say that the state and federal governments provide education, emergency fire and medical services, environmental protection and maintenance of monuments and historical landmarks. Could this be changed to ""responsible for providing public services for their constituents"?
- Done - this is much better wording, thanks!
- "On November 9, 2017, the state legislature approved the creation of four indigenous municipalities (Coatetelco, Xoxocotla, Hueyapan and Tetelcingo), effective on January 1, 2019. However, due to objections by authorities in Cuautla, it was decided on July 26, 2018 that Tetelcingo would not be included in the list of new municipalities." This should be reworded to say the most important part up front: that these are the newest municipalities in Morelos. Otherwise one wonders why four seemingly random municipalities are being mentioned.
- Done - this is a good suggestion, I think I reworded it correctly
- That's a good way to word it.
- The incorporation date for the three municipalities created on January 1, 2019 should be sourced in the table as well. The current source at the column heading only goes as far as 1995.
- Done
That's all. Steelkamp (talk) 06:42, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks Steelkamp for an excellent review. No issues, all suggestions made. Mattximus (talk) 00:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Steelkamp (talk) 08:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]- "Tetelcingo would not be included in the list of new municipalities" - this is slightly confusing as it sounds like the municipality was still created, it just wasn't included on some list somewhere. So was it in fact not created at all?
- Fixed wording.
- Photo captions don't need full stops as they are not sentences
- Fixed captions with better wording as well
- "the oldest date in which the municipality is referred to is included" => "the earliest year in which the municipality is referred to is listed" would read much better
- Fixed, agree that's much better wording.
- That's what I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:55, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks ChrisTheDude! Excellent review, and I've made all changes, no issues. Mattximus (talk) 00:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from OlifanofmrTenanant
[edit]I'll take a look but the first thing that jumps out is Hueyapan is linked twice in the final paragraph. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 21:12, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Done
- Footnotes C,D, and H could very loosely be seen as unsourced, especially since the notes about name changes are sourced.
- Done
- The states of Mexico list is linked twice in the first paragraph
- Done
- It is also linked in the body as state capital. Could you explain the connection?
- Done - I just removed the link, I don't think one is needed here.
- All I found, ping me when needed Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 21:27, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks so much OlifanofmrTennant! All your concerns have been addressed, no issues! Mattximus (talk) 00:09, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 03:53, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.