Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Mr. Basketball USA/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Dabomb87 17:36, 19 February 2012 [1].

Mr. Basketball USA

Featured list candidates/Mr. Basketball USA/archive1

Nominator(s): TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:25, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because I find the subject interesting and different from most current FLs. TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:25, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from ♫GoP♫_T ^C _N 14:32, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

*Comments

Table does not meet WP:ACCESS and MOS:DTT.
- Are there specific issues in this regard?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 16:28, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Names in the Player column don't sort correctly, use {{sortname}}
- ~~The template does not seem to be sorting according to its own description page.~~--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:53, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Same in the last column
- Does it make sense to sort on the last column with multiple names?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 16:07, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I personally don't like the ALL CAPS writing in the first paragraph. EA SPORTS could be "EA Sports", or "ESPNHIGHSCHOOL.com" just "espnhighschool.com"♫GoP♫_T^C_N 14:11, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Caps fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:28, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Giants2008 (Talk) 23:05, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments –

Pair of commas is needed surrounding "also known as ESPN RISE National Player of the Year".
- Fixed with an addendum.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:24, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Should "boy's" be "boys'" in the first sentence?
- Dunno. My logic is from all the college basketball teams that are named Michigan Wolverines men's basketball, Indiana Hoosiers men's basketball, etc.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:32, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - According to this edit it is suppose to be boys'.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:16, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Why is "National Player" capitalized later in the first sentence? I doubt that it should be.
- Thanks.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:34, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The List section heading is on the plain side. Something like "Winners" would be better.
- Done.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:37, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The list should be ordered from first winner to last, not the other way around.
- Done.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:52, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A key explaning the position abbreviations would be helpful to include.
- Done.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:59, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Publishers of the references shouldn't be italicized since they're not printed publications.
- I am not sure what you mean. ESPN HS is a print magazine, I believe.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:54, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Important: What is citing the table? If it's the external link, it must be given as a general reference. Just having it as an EL isn't clear enough. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:19, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed, I think.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 08:08, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Runner-up column should be sorting by last name, not first name.
- I am confused on how to sort this because often the source includes two runners up.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:52, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - I didn't notice that. In that case I'd recommend sorting by the last name of the first runner-up listed. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:05, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - This seems to be a task to do while watching the Super Bowl.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:16, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      - I tackled this today.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:44, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
One more I noticed while checking edits: in the first sentence, "as" needs to be added in "and formerly known the...". Giants2008 (Talk) 23:05, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Done.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:16, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Meets FL standards. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:04, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from MT (talk) 06:08, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

*Comment — Perhaps there should an explanation about the word "consensus" in the Runner(s)-up columns for readers who are not familiar with sports voting process. — MT (talk) 04:27, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- That sounds like a good idea, but the source does not explain the term. I know what it would usually mean, but based on current voting procedures, there is no such thing as a consensus winner without a runner-up. I don't know what past voting procedures were.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:24, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Well, it didn't notice that they have different voting procedure over the years. Anyway, what about blanking the cells (or inserting dashes) to indicate that there is no runner-up in those years. — MT (talk) 04:05, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - O.K. please look over the current legend following the change.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:50, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      - It's much clearer now, thanks! — MT (talk) 06:08, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 11:25, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Is there a reason that ESPN HS and ESPN RISE are inconsistently presented, italics/not italics?
- fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:47, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The lead would make more sense to me if it was in chronlogical order.
- Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:35, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Many of the players have images, it's a shame this article has none.
- Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:04, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"The panel includes five McDonald's All-American selection committee members." is this significant? Not to a non-expert.
- The proper article is linked in the paragraph above. If they are unfamiliar with the McD AA then they should have clicked on the link.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:43, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Link all positions or none of them in the sortable table.
- Done.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:15, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"F - Forward" - en-dash.
- All En-dash now.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:17, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
em-dash explanations in the key, one ends with a period, the other doesn't end in a period.
- Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:31, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"The following players have been named Mr. Basketball USA.[2]" not sure this is necessary, particularly given the name of the section and given the caption in the table heading.
- fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:41, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like you're actually using en-dash not em-dash in the school column.
- Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:22, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
LSU/UNLV etc, don't use abbreviations without explaining what they are.
- The four abbreviations (UNLV, LSU, USC and UCLA) are all considered so common that the linked pages use these abbreviations rather than full names. We are using the names that people would look for.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:48, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Rambling Man (talk) 09:00, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from NapHit (talk) 14:34, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
'Comments Images could do with alt text ALT added.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:31, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Any reason why you use 95% font size instead of 100%? NapHit (talk) 13:42, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] I blindly copied code from another FL (don't remember which one). Fixed it.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:23, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support NapHit (talk) 14:34, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Suggest remove the infobox picture, as too much space below.--♫GoP♫_T^C_N 14:26, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I thought spacing like this was fairly common and innocuous.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:38, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Well, maybe because I like compactness; I nonetheless support its promotion to featured status.--♫GoP♫_T ^C _N 14:28, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.