Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of myotines/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Hey man im josh via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2024 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of myotines (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): PresN 19:19, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Bats list #6 and mammal list #47: Myotinae. Now that we got the giant vespertilionine list out of the way, the rest of the family Vespertilionidae is easier: this subfamily is a third of the size, with only 3 genera to keep track of. Still just another 121 tiny bats, but a few of these guys have decided that when they swoop down to pluck bugs off of the water, they're okay with snagging a fish while they're at it. Also, in contrast to the angry little guy of the past list, this list has the Yuma myotis down at the bottom who's just done with it all and ready to go home. In any case, as always, this list reflects formatting discussions from prior lists as well as the scientific consensus on the family. Thanks for reviewing! --PresN 19:19, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]- I don't know if I missed this on previous lists but......"Members [plural] of this subfamily are called a myotine [singular]" - maybe "A member...."....?
- "neritic marine" - is there a link for this? I don't think it's a common/well-known term
- Guatemalan myotis - habitat is blank
- That's it - great work as ever! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:53, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @ChrisTheDude: Fixed all three, thanks! --PresN 22:17, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:23, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Gonzo_fan2007
[edit]- Read through twice and can't find anything to nitpick at. Nice work. Support « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 19:15, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Source review:
- Reliable enough for the information being cited
- Consistent date formatting
- Consistent and proper reference formatting
- Appropriate wikilinks where applicable
- Spot checks on 11 sources match what they are being cited for
Looks good! Support Hey man im josh (talk) 15:48, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:48, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.