Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Nightwish/archive2
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 00:39, 20 October 2008 [1].
- Nominator(s): - Aki
- previous FAC
- previous FAR
- WP:FFA, has not been on main page
I, as well as lots of others, including User:Sn0wflake and User:SoothingR, has worked really hard on this article and I can't come up with more things to edit or add. I definitely think it deserves to be a featured article. - Aki (talk) 13:32, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose — serious lack of citations, particularly in the first half of the article. Additionally, many of the citations are bare and/or poorly formatted. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 13:34, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose - Large chunks unreferenced, including opinions. References are a mess, need publisher and last access date at the very least. Current ref 15 is "Kerrang!"... which is totally unverifiable, which is just an example. Iffy sources, (A YouTube Video? http://www.amvlyrics.com/ (should we even link to a site like that, do they have permission to put up copyrighted material?) Lots of short one and two sentence paragraphs. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:48, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Yep, sorry, oppose too based on the lack of citations for a lot of information. Gary King (talk) 19:45, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose: I love this band, and would love to see this as FA, but it needs to be sourced much more thoroughly. For example, the section, "Over the Hills and Far Away EP (2001)" lacks a single citation! Cosmic Latte (talk) 22:13, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose — article has a decent structure, but too many problems, including all of the issues noted above. --an odd name 23:03, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.