Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Ada Wong/archive2
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was promoted by Gog the Mild via FACBot (talk) 19 October 2024 [1].
- Nominator(s): JokEobard (talk) ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 22:37, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
This article is about a character from the Resident Evil game and film series; who is known for her red dress.
The article has undergone a lot of changes due to the reviewers at the 2nd peer review. It received several reviews from Aoba47, PanagiotisZois, Panini!, and Crisco 1492 (thanks for their help). Because of it, I feel like the article is ready for the FA criteria. Thank you! ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 22:37, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Support from Panagiotis Zois
[edit]Given my involvement with heavily rewriting the content of the "Reception" section, could I even take part in this FAC? I feel like a "conflict-of-interest" situation might arise.--PanagiotisZois (talk) 13:46, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hey. I don't think thats a problem in fact some reviewers wants to assist nominators more in a different way so that they can easily resolve any issues. Additionally, you were also not the author. Just in case you don't want to continue the review, you can strike it out. Thanks! Regards ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 14:05, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- One thing I wanted to ask is about the "Reception" section. The part about the Dragon Lady trope is interesting, but as it stands, only two sources are used. Are there at least one-two more sources discussing this trope that could be added? PanagiotisZois (talk) 09:31, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi PanagiotisZois. No, I went throughout and couldn't find more. ๐BP!๐ (๐) 09:44, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- That's unfortunate, but understandable. All right. I've gone over the whole article again. It look really good. There are a few things I would like see changed, but that's more of personal taste, and not something that is required to make the article better. Taking this into account, I support this article's promotion. Always nice to see articles of female character get more love and attention. PanagiotisZois (talk) 13:18, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! ๐BP!๐ (๐) 13:22, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- That's unfortunate, but understandable. All right. I've gone over the whole article again. It look really good. There are a few things I would like see changed, but that's more of personal taste, and not something that is required to make the article better. Taking this into account, I support this article's promotion. Always nice to see articles of female character get more love and attention. PanagiotisZois (talk) 13:18, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi PanagiotisZois. No, I went throughout and couldn't find more. ๐BP!๐ (๐) 09:44, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- One thing I wanted to ask is about the "Reception" section. The part about the Dragon Lady trope is interesting, but as it stands, only two sources are used. Are there at least one-two more sources discussing this trope that could be added? PanagiotisZois (talk) 09:31, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
Vacant0
[edit]Will review this again. Vacant0 (talk โข contribs) 10:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Ref 43 missing page(s).
- Hi Vacant0. I don't think they need book pages since the book itself contains almost everything about the RE plot; and as usual almost the entire book pages mentions Ada (same with the usage of that sources from Jill Valentine). ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 12:58, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- I do not see any particular issues with references and their reliability. Valnet sources are used, though TheGamer is now considered reliable.
- I only used two TheGamer, but it is marked reliable unlike the content before. ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 12:58, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- First ref in the Ref 46 is still confusing me. Do you have an issue number or ISSN of the comic book?
- Not at all. I ended up removing the Chinese comic book source. ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 12:58, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Spotchecked:
- In Resident Evil series: Ref 14, 15, 18, 20, 22, 25 (only mentions "
Also, completion of Separate Ways will further flesh out new information files which get added to "Ada's Report."
")
- Nice caught! I Ended up removing the claim of ref 25 because I cannot support the claim. ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 13:31, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Other appearances: Ref 31, 33, 39, 47
- Concept and design: Ref 49, 54, 56, 58, 62
- Voice-over and live-action actresses: Ref 4, 12
- Reception: Ref 8, 66, 75, 76
I'll take another look at the prose by the end of the week and will then decide my vote. Vacant0 (talk โข contribs) 13:24, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! Take your time ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 13:31, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- I gave the article another read. It has certainly been improved since the last FAC, so, again, you have my support. Vacant0 (talk โข contribs) 14:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Crisco 1492
[edit]- Just a quick question - I'll have another read later, as this has changed a lot since the peer review. Does Jennings offer any arguments for why Ada "demonstrate[s] the intersectional potential of the feminine gaze?" The next line, that Jennings criticized the game's whitewashing of her heritage, suggests to me that Jennings was arguing that Ada's representation as both a woman and as a person of Asian descent brought more potential agency to the character. Why, though? Is this worth a footnote, or even just a bit of a more explicit clause explaining her argument? โ Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Chris Woodrich I expanded a bit [2], and yeah she mentioned about her representation as a woman. I hope this is fine for you as a non-native English speaker. ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 02:18, 11 September 2024 (UTC)<
- To avoid too much mark-up, we had some discussion of Jennings' arguments at my talk page. Linked here for transparency. โ Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Chris Woodrich I expanded a bit [2], and yeah she mentioned about her representation as a woman. I hope this is fine for you as a non-native English speaker. ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 02:18, 11 September 2024 (UTC)<
- Lede
-
- Worth mentioning in the lede that Lily Gao has reprised the role in the most recent release?
- I'm not sure if this is needed as this may be potentially being removed by my co-nom, but I added it [3] ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 04:43, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Is there any way to avoid mentioning Resident Evil 2 twice in two sentences? I had reworked it to use "latter", but that was reverted. Maybe "the prototype for the sequel"? โ Chris Woodrich (talk) 09:17, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- My conom reverted it. I replaced it now with "sequel". ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 09:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Appearances
-
- After the restructuring, it's not clear who Alice is on first mention.
- Added [4] ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 04:43, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- What's the distinction between an alternate skin and a costume? โ Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Replaced the "costume" as an "alternate skin" [5]. ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 04:43, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Concept and design
-
- "randomly and without much thought" - This is a bit awkwardly phrased. Any means of rewording this? โ Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:50, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hmmm, not sure how since Kadoi said he "randomly thought her name without much thought" in the first Resident Evil. ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 21:17, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- If that's the word he used, we may stray too much if we rephrase it. It's a minor quibble, anyways. โ Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:26, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hmmm, not sure how since Kadoi said he "randomly thought her name without much thought" in the first Resident Evil. ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 21:17, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- "Separate Ways" is mentioned three times in three sentences. Any chance of reworking this to avoid the repetition?
- Honestly, I prefer to repeat than to say DLC imor minigame because it confuses readers. In the original RE4, it is a minigame; but in the remake it is now DLC. Or you got any suggestion? ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 21:17, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- I reworked it with this edit. โ Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:26, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Honestly, I prefer to repeat than to say DLC imor minigame because it confuses readers. In the original RE4, it is a minigame; but in the remake it is now DLC. Or you got any suggestion? ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 21:17, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Reception
-
- For the feminist critiques of the character, I was wondering if there is any consideration of the deuteragonist in Ada's chapter in Resident Evil 6 vis-a-vis Ada herself. She has a name, a face, and a known story, whereas the faceless male-coded deuteragonist in her chapter is there simply to ensure that the game's co-play mechanics are available (he isn't even H.U.N.K.) โ Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:50, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Chris Woodrich You mean if I can find more reception about her appearance in RE6? Nope. ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 21:17, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- It was more wondering if anyone had contrasted Ada with the Player 2 character in that chapter, but given that the character is essentially a non-entity, makes sense that nobody has. โ Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:20, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Probably not, but I will recheck it again to make sure in Saturday since I couldn't access my computer yet this time. ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 21:24, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- It was more wondering if anyone had contrasted Ada with the Player 2 character in that chapter, but given that the character is essentially a non-entity, makes sense that nobody has. โ Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:20, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Chris Woodrich You mean if I can find more reception about her appearance in RE6? Nope. ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 21:17, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Overall, this article is looking really solid right now. โ Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:50, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support, based on the peer review and review here. This appears to be a thorough review of the sources available, and it feels accessible to the average reader (though as someone who has played the games since release, and whose first edits were RElated, I might not be the best judge of that) โ Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:27, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Aoba47
[edit]I will do a thorough read-through of the article later in the week. I have a few quick comments for now.
- I would avoid repeating "video game" in the following sentence as it does make the prose unnecessarily repetitive: (Video game publications have positively responded to Ada as a video game character.)
- I would move the Resident Evil 4 link up to this part, (a remake of the original game), as that is the first time that the game is mentioned. I would also include the year up there as well.
- The source links for File:Early concept art of Ada.jpg are both dead (at least for me). Both links go to blank images for me.
Please ping me in a week if I have not posted anything further. Best of luck with the FAC. Aoba47 (talk) 03:00, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- RE: Source link, I have cited the PC port of RE2 as that was where the copies I provided the nominators came from. I have also fixed the links to Fandom โ hopefully they work now. โ Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:39, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Chris! Also, I already replaced "video game publications" and about the link of RE4, it was later removed per [6] ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 13:12, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the responses. Aoba47 (talk) 15:05, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Chris! Also, I already replaced "video game publications" and about the link of RE4, it was later removed per [6] ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 13:12, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- I think this part, (the character that would later become Ada was initially depicted as Linda), could be condensed to something like (Ada was initially depicted as Linda) to be more concise.
- Thank you for your comments! The reason I phrased this sentence the way that I did is because the final version of Ada that debuted in RE2 is an amalgamation of two prototypical characters that (initially) had no relation whatsoever: John Clemens girlfriend "Ada", who was only mentioned by name in RE1; and the Umbrella researcher Linda. Writer Noboru Sugimura ultimately gave Linda's role as Leon's supporting character to Ada in the final build, so Ada and Linda were never the same characters at all. I therefore feel that it is more appropriate to say that the (prototypical) character that was (eventually) transformed into Ada was initially depicted as Linda. I hope I'm adequately getting my meaning across, and I would be more than happy to discuss this further. :)JokEobard (talk) 08:37, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the explanation. That makes sense to me. Aoba47 (talk) 17:36, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your comments! The reason I phrased this sentence the way that I did is because the final version of Ada that debuted in RE2 is an amalgamation of two prototypical characters that (initially) had no relation whatsoever: John Clemens girlfriend "Ada", who was only mentioned by name in RE1; and the Umbrella researcher Linda. Writer Noboru Sugimura ultimately gave Linda's role as Leon's supporting character to Ada in the final build, so Ada and Linda were never the same characters at all. I therefore feel that it is more appropriate to say that the (prototypical) character that was (eventually) transformed into Ada was initially depicted as Linda. I hope I'm adequately getting my meaning across, and I would be more than happy to discuss this further. :)JokEobard (talk) 08:37, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- For this part, (After the prototype was scrapped), I would avoid the word "scrapped" as it is too informal for Wikipedia.
- I do not think the director link is needed for (director Hideki Kamiya) as it does create an instead of a WP:SEAOFBLUE.
- This could be a matter of personal preference, but I would revise this sentence, (Ada's appearance was designed by artists Isao Ohishi and Ryoji Shimogama), to a more active tense: (i.e. Artists Isao Ohishi and Ryoji Shimogama designed Ada's appearance.)
- I would better attribute the quote in this sentence: (Recognizing Ada's minimal role in the main campaign and her being a "very strong character" that "deserves to really stand out" in Resident Evil 4, Capcom developed a short campaign dedicated to her.) The sentence attributes it to Capcom in general, but the source makes it clear that it is from Masachika Kawata.
- I have two comments on this part, (who helps protagonist Ethan Winters, such as helping him escape one of his trials early in the game). I would avoid repeating helps / helping in the same sentence as it is too repetitive. Also, is there a better and clearer descriptor for Ethan Winters? It would be helpful to give readers a better understanding of who this character is in the game itself.
These are my comments up to the "Reception" section. I hope that this is helpful and let me know if you have any questions. Aoba47 (talk) 21:14, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Aoba47. It seems like all of them are already resolved by @JokEobard (Thanks to him). Though, I don't know what's the best descriptor for Ethan Winters. Replacing "protagonist" into "civilian" seems kinda odd for you or not? Thanks! ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 12:12, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the response. I am likely just over-thinking it. "Protagonist" is likely the best word choice as it would clearly let readers know that Ethan is the primary character from that game. I agree that "civilian" would not really work in this instance, and after looking through the article about him, I could not really come up with a better word choice so I believe your current version is the best in regards to this. Aoba47 (talk) 17:38, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Would it be possible to use a more specific descriptor for Jenny Platz other than "critic". I would say that even something like "scholar" is more precise, but that is already used for Andrei Nae later in the same paragraph. I just think that the "critic" word choice is a bit too broad for this instance, and it is already used three times in close proximity to one another as well.
- Replaced ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 21:18, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- The word "femme fatale" gets repeated quite a bit at the end of the first paragraph and for the second paragraph as well. I would see if there are ways to avoid such repetition if possible.
- I think that the prose for the Andrei Nae parts could use some further revision. It has some great information and I find it very interesting, but I think that it could flow better overall. Let me know if further clarification is needed for this. One suggestion is that I do not think this part, (Concerning Ada's portrayal as a femme fatale), is really needed. I do understand how it is being used as a transition and to make things flow better, but it does feel a bit repetitious as the previous sentence already makes it clear that the discussion will be on Ada's role as a femme fatale and the subsequent reviews about it.
- Removed ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 21:29, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- I believe that when discussing the critic's opinions, the past tense should be used. This is pretty consistent throughout the "Reception" section, but I would revise this part, (scholar Andrei Nae notes), to be in the past tense and to double-check this section in case there are other instances of this that I missed.
- I am not sure if "appeal" is the right word choice for this part, (makes her accentuated sexuality as a femme fatale appeal to Orientalist clichรฉs of East-Asian erotic femininity). Maybe something like "conform to Orientalist clichรฉs" or "continue Orientalist clichรฉs". Neither of my suggestions are particularly good either, but I did keep coming back to this part as I am not sure you can really appeal to cliches. I am also not sure if femininity really needs a link here. I would think one for East Asian would be best. Also should that be hyphenated? It is not done for the Wikipedia article, but I am honestly the worst when it comes to this.
- Replaced ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 21:18, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- I would suggest that you remove the stereotypical link as most readers would be familiar with this concept and it would avoid WP:SEAOFBLUE as it is next to "Dragon Lady", which is a more beneficial link.
- Removed ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 21:18, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- I would give some sort of descriptor for Stephanie Jennings to provide some background and context for readers.
- Added, but not sure if this is the best descriptor for her after checking here [7]. ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 21:18, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- I would say that is better than nothing. It can be difficult to find a good descriptor for this if the person does not have a clear focus in their overall research. It should be fine in my opinion. Aoba47 (talk) 02:02, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Added, but not sure if this is the best descriptor for her after checking here [7]. ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 21:18, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- I am uncertain about the structure of the following sentence: (Ada's presence as one of the series' few multiracial characters, she opined, demonstrates the intersectional potential of the feminine gaze, albeit without exploration of the character's racial identity.) The placement of "she opined" in the middle does not seem particularly beneficial for readers. I would also avoid "opined" in general, but that could be a matter of personal preference. I do not have any strong opinions about it, but I believe that I have seen it discussed in other FACs. That being said, I think the sentence structure is more of my issue here.
- Already restructured by other editor. ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 21:18, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Should the criticism for Lily Gao's vocal performance be mentioned in the lead as it has a separate paragraph in this section? It is a shame to hear that Gao got this kind of harassment in general.
- Added ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 21:32, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- I would clarify that Gao was the one that received the criticism, not the character itself. It may also be worth briefly noting the review bombing as well to provide that additional context for readers. Aoba47 (talk) 02:02, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Added ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 21:32, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- I would make sure that authors are linked in the citations if they have a Wikipedia article. Anita Sarkeesian and Esther MacCallum-Stewart should be linked in their citations.
- Done ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 21:18, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for your patience with my review. Once everything has been addressed, I will read through the article a few more times just to make sure that I have not missed anything. I hope that is helpful. I have really enjoyed reading through this article. Ada has always been a character from RE that stood out to me the most so it was nice to finally learn more about her. I am a huge fan of spies in general. It would have been cool to see a RE game lean more into the spy stuff with Ada as a lead, but I doubt most people would want that lol. I hope you are having a great start to your weekend! Aoba47 (talk) 18:09, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'd play the ever-loving... out of an Ada-centric game. On topic, as I had proposed the sentences summarizing Jennings' arguments, I've rephrased the last one to "She suggested that Ada's presence as one of the series' few multiracial characters demonstrates the intersectional potential of the feminine gaze, albeit undermined by the limited exploration of the character's racial identity." โ Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:10, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you both for being sincere. This character as a spy is my favorite thing to the franchise. I'm glad Aoba enjoyed reading it. I am attempting to work on it. ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 21:18, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- I am glad that I am not the only one who would want an Ada-centric game lol. I just love spies in general, and I cannot really think of anything zombie-related taking that kind of angle. The rephrase looks great to me. Thank you for being patient and understanding with my comments. I have a minor comment on the citations. I have been told in past FACs to be consistent with whether or not citation titles use title case or not. I am mostly raising it to your attention, and it would not affect my review as it is more so focused on the prose. Aoba47 (talk) 02:09, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the comment and yeah thanks to Chris Woodrich for rephrasing it. I already did italized the game or film titles before and I am not sure if there are still other citations that have been overlooked or you mean this type of capitalization [8]? ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 02:15, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- I am referencing how words in the citation titles are capitalized. See MOS:TITLECAPS. I do not believe that it is required, but I will leave that up to the source reviewer. Again, this is just something that I wanted to raise to your attention and it is not a requirement for my review. I will read through the article later in the weekend. I do not imagine that I will find anything major, but I want to make sure to be thorough. Aoba47 (talk) 02:32, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- I see. I will attempt to go through all the citation titles on what is needed to change. Thanks a lot for reviewing! ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 02:42, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- I support this FAC for promotion based on the prose. Best of luck with the nomination. I was debating on asking if the "a mysterious masked figure" description for Ada's planned appearance in Resident Evil Village should be more specific and mention the plague doctor element, but it may be getting too specific for something that was ultimately cut. Otherwise, everything looks good to me. Aoba47 (talk) 02:05, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for reviewing! ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 02:24, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- I support this FAC for promotion based on the prose. Best of luck with the nomination. I was debating on asking if the "a mysterious masked figure" description for Ada's planned appearance in Resident Evil Village should be more specific and mention the plague doctor element, but it may be getting too specific for something that was ultimately cut. Otherwise, everything looks good to me. Aoba47 (talk) 02:05, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- I see. I will attempt to go through all the citation titles on what is needed to change. Thanks a lot for reviewing! ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 02:42, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- I am referencing how words in the citation titles are capitalized. See MOS:TITLECAPS. I do not believe that it is required, but I will leave that up to the source reviewer. Again, this is just something that I wanted to raise to your attention and it is not a requirement for my review. I will read through the article later in the weekend. I do not imagine that I will find anything major, but I want to make sure to be thorough. Aoba47 (talk) 02:32, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the comment and yeah thanks to Chris Woodrich for rephrasing it. I already did italized the game or film titles before and I am not sure if there are still other citations that have been overlooked or you mean this type of capitalization [8]? ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 02:15, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- I am glad that I am not the only one who would want an Ada-centric game lol. I just love spies in general, and I cannot really think of anything zombie-related taking that kind of angle. The rephrase looks great to me. Thank you for being patient and understanding with my comments. I have a minor comment on the citations. I have been told in past FACs to be consistent with whether or not citation titles use title case or not. I am mostly raising it to your attention, and it would not affect my review as it is more so focused on the prose. Aoba47 (talk) 02:09, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you both for being sincere. This character as a spy is my favorite thing to the franchise. I'm glad Aoba enjoyed reading it. I am attempting to work on it. ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 21:18, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Image and source review (with two notes about completeness)
[edit]File:Early concept art of Ada.jpg has the problem that it seems to illustrate a part of the article subject more than the whole, and thus doesn't meet the "significantly" part of WP:NFCC#8. Otherwise the image placement and stuff is fine. Source-wise: Are these Twitter accounts and Terasaki, Kimberly associated with the franchise? #58 and the sources under #70 throw an error message that must be suppressed. The bibliography seems reliable, while the rest of the sourcing is conditional, so to speak, on Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Sources. One thing that jumps out to me is that we don't have much description of her appearance, even though there are one or two paragraphs discussing the reception of her appearance. Also, the games themselves aren't cited as sources anywhere. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:08, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Jojo. Just a comment about the FU image. I proposed it at the peer review because the 1.5 concept art and the art for the model ultimately used shows some shifts in the character from "Linda" to "Ada". The left image shows the researcher design, including an Umbrella logo on the jacket, while the right image shows her in the design that was ultimately used. A similar comparison FU image is used at Jill Valentine, though in that case the image highlights a particular outfit rather than two iterations of the character. โ Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:42, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Jo-Jo Eumerus The two twitter sources are associated to the franchise like Vicky voiced her in DBD, while the terasaki source supports the claim that Sally Cahill vliced RE2, RE4 and RE Dark Chronicles. I don't understand why the sources at #58 and #70 are error to you since it was sourced fine; I don't know what needs to "suppressed" with that (You need to clarify what it is since other editors didn't spot any error at those sources at all). Also, there's nothing more that can be found to add about her description and most of it are now already at the "appearances section" and there are some games are cited like who designed her appearance. ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 21:46, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- There is a "Harv warning: There is no link pointing to this citation" warning at 58 and 70. My question about the Twitter sources was more what makes them reliable sources. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- There is no "Harv warning: There is no link pointing to this citation" at us from our POV? (I also asked my conom if he saw the "error" or "harv warning", but nope) Also, the Twitter sources came from the voice actors themselves (Other FA also uses that kind of tweet as a source), so I will say that they're fine. ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 07:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Seems like it's a function on which userscripts one has. I also note that archiving Google Books links is pointless. Did some spotchecking, nothing jumped out to me but I must stress that I don't have much confidence in my assessments of the reliability of typical video game sources. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:12, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- I see. When I use the sources, I did make sure to check it first at WP:VG/RS before using it. I will say all of them are reliable. ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 09:33, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Are they high-quality, though? That's a bit of a tougher question. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Jo-Jo Eumerus Yes. I did not include any inconclusive sources. The 2 sources of TheGamer are the only ones that may be controversial cause its Valnet, but it says "News posts and original content after August 2020 are considered generally reliable." + that sources were also used in the recent promoted article Raichu. So, it will be fine. ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 11:32, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Are they high-quality, though? That's a bit of a tougher question. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- I see. When I use the sources, I did make sure to check it first at WP:VG/RS before using it. I will say all of them are reliable. ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 09:33, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Seems like it's a function on which userscripts one has. I also note that archiving Google Books links is pointless. Did some spotchecking, nothing jumped out to me but I must stress that I don't have much confidence in my assessments of the reliability of typical video game sources. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:12, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- There is no "Harv warning: There is no link pointing to this citation" at us from our POV? (I also asked my conom if he saw the "error" or "harv warning", but nope) Also, the Twitter sources came from the voice actors themselves (Other FA also uses that kind of tweet as a source), so I will say that they're fine. ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 07:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- There is a "Harv warning: There is no link pointing to this citation" warning at 58 and 70. My question about the Twitter sources was more what makes them reliable sources. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Boneless Pizza! - just confirming I see the errors as well, at 46, 58, and 70. I think it's from the way that these references have been nested. The script seems to be coded to ignore harv references generated automatically by the citation family of templates if and only if the reference is on its own between REF tags. By having extra formatting, the script is returning error messages. To fix this, each nested ref should have the field |ref=none added to the template. โ Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:24, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Its kinda odd that other people can't see it, but thanks for informing me. Now I know what @Jo-Jo Eumerus mean. I already added it. Does it resolved the issues? Chris Woodrich ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 10:47, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- As Jo-Jo said, it isn't enabled by default; you have to have a particular script (User:Trappist the monk/HarvErrors) enabled. Since SFN is my preferred citation style, I installed it a while ago. Returning to Ada, this appears to have been fixed. โ Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:53, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- I see. Thanks! ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 11:54, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- As Jo-Jo said, it isn't enabled by default; you have to have a particular script (User:Trappist the monk/HarvErrors) enabled. Since SFN is my preferred citation style, I installed it a while ago. Returning to Ada, this appears to have been fixed. โ Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:53, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Its kinda odd that other people can't see it, but thanks for informing me. Now I know what @Jo-Jo Eumerus mean. I already added it. Does it resolved the issues? Chris Woodrich ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 10:47, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Jo-Jo and thanks for the above. This one is also going to need a source to text integrity spot check and a review for over-close paraphrasing. Any chance that you could oblige? Thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:23, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Spot-check
[edit]Reviewing this version:
* 4 Do the games and commentary name Taylor as the voice actor?
- Yes ๐BP!๐ (๐) 14:04, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- 10 Seems like we can't verify this until the webarchive works again.
- ref 10 supports the first sentence, while 42 at the second sentence. ๐BP!๐ (๐) 14:14, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Looks like this was removed wholesale. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:31, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- ref 10 supports the first sentence, while 42 at the second sentence. ๐BP!๐ (๐) 14:14, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- 11 OK
- 12 Seems redundant to 11
- Removed it ๐BP!๐ (๐)
- Still there, seems like. Also "portrayed Ada in the live-action film" appears twice, perhaps it can be reworded? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:31, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Jo-Jo Eumerus reworded, and the current source for ref 12 os different now and the Complex source was already removed. The current source for ref 12 supports the voice being dubbed in Japanese, aswell as the promoting thing from Li. ๐BP!๐ (๐) 12:32, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Still there, seems like. Also "portrayed Ada in the live-action film" appears twice, perhaps it can be reworded? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:31, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Removed it ๐BP!๐ (๐)
- 20 I am not sure which part of 17 or 20 supports this.
- 17 supports everything, while I did replaced the source 20 into Digital trend to support the claim where Wesker sent Ada to steal the virus. ๐BP!๐ (๐) 14:04, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Now "Los Iluminados" doesn't appear anywhere. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:31, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Jo-Jo Eumerus ehh, it is mentioned in the ref 17. ๐BP!๐ (๐) 12:25, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- I bet you ctrl + f it, but in their website they double spelled the "L", which it was written as "Los Illuminados". ๐BP!๐ (๐) 13:03, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Aye, the article might need correction then. Also, does the cult use the parasite, is it infected by it, or both? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 14:08, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Jo-Jo Eumerus the IGN articles does not us since they are spled correctlt. Also, both. They are infected and does contain the Las plagas parasite and often used it like for ex. when you blow up their head the giant parasite emerged and attacks protagonist. Is this aye already since this is the last one? ๐BP!๐ (๐) 15:42, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- From the source, it doesn't seem clear that the cult is using the parasite, instead of merely being its victim. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:37, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Jo-Jo Eumerus Sorry for confusing you. I did ask RE fans at discord and they were right that the cult was only infected, and they didn't "use" for parasite since the creature is already controlling when they were infected. So, they didn't use them but was only infected and being controlled by the Las plagas parasite.๐BP!๐ (๐) 10:45, 17 October 2024 (UTC)- (3rd party comment) Referring to the primary source (i.e., RE4), every villager met by Leon and Ada has a Las Plagas parasite in them ("infected"). Three leaders (Saddler, Mendez, and Saddler) have a "higher breed" of parasite that allows them to control others infected by Las Plagas. They also "use" Las Plagas to infect others; Saddler's ultimate goal is to infect Ashley (who is implanted with a parasite about midway through the game) and have her infect her father, the President, thereby allowing him to control the United States through him. This is consistent in both the original RE4 and in the remake. So, based on the games, "infected" (as per Ref 17) and "used" (which doesn't seem to be in the sources used) are both correct. That being said, I agree that we need a source that explicitly says "use" if we're going to use that word. โ Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:23, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Its hard to find and verify that claim that they "used" the parasite. I reworded it now to only "Infected" Since most of the cult were also victims and were just infected only. Update, we decided to reword it and doesnt mention "infected" or "used" anymore. I reworded it into simply into "from the los Illuminados cult". User:Jo-Jo Eumerus ๐BP!๐ (๐) 11:31, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Any update to this? ( your final concern) . User:Jo-Jo Eumerus ๐BP!๐ (๐) 10:21, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Its hard to find and verify that claim that they "used" the parasite. I reworded it now to only "Infected" Since most of the cult were also victims and were just infected only. Update, we decided to reword it and doesnt mention "infected" or "used" anymore. I reworded it into simply into "from the los Illuminados cult". User:Jo-Jo Eumerus ๐BP!๐ (๐) 11:31, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- (3rd party comment) Referring to the primary source (i.e., RE4), every villager met by Leon and Ada has a Las Plagas parasite in them ("infected"). Three leaders (Saddler, Mendez, and Saddler) have a "higher breed" of parasite that allows them to control others infected by Las Plagas. They also "use" Las Plagas to infect others; Saddler's ultimate goal is to infect Ashley (who is implanted with a parasite about midway through the game) and have her infect her father, the President, thereby allowing him to control the United States through him. This is consistent in both the original RE4 and in the remake. So, based on the games, "infected" (as per Ref 17) and "used" (which doesn't seem to be in the sources used) are both correct. That being said, I agree that we need a source that explicitly says "use" if we're going to use that word. โ Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:23, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- From the source, it doesn't seem clear that the cult is using the parasite, instead of merely being its victim. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:37, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Jo-Jo Eumerus the IGN articles does not us since they are spled correctlt. Also, both. They are infected and does contain the Las plagas parasite and often used it like for ex. when you blow up their head the giant parasite emerged and attacks protagonist. Is this aye already since this is the last one? ๐BP!๐ (๐) 15:42, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Aye, the article might need correction then. Also, does the cult use the parasite, is it infected by it, or both? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 14:08, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- I bet you ctrl + f it, but in their website they double spelled the "L", which it was written as "Los Illuminados". ๐BP!๐ (๐) 13:03, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Jo-Jo Eumerus ehh, it is mentioned in the ref 17. ๐BP!๐ (๐) 12:25, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Now "Los Iluminados" doesn't appear anywhere. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:31, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- 17 supports everything, while I did replaced the source 20 into Digital trend to support the claim where Wesker sent Ada to steal the virus. ๐BP!๐ (๐) 14:04, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- 24 Seems like we can't verify this until the webarchive works again.
- I will say this source definitely support the claim and was spotchecked by Vacant before web.archive.org was taken down. ๐BP!๐ (๐) 14:31, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- 30 OK
- 31 Doesn't appear in article.
- Removed ๐BP!๐ (๐) 14:14, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- 32 OK
- 35 OK
- 41 That Resident Evil: City of the Dead is a book is somewhat implicit here rather than explicit.
- Eh, I just ended up removing the sentencr, but she still appears so her being mentioned appearing at novelization would be fine. ๐BP!๐ (๐) 14:14, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- 45 OK
- 47 The Linda part is supported by 48? Not sure what it supports in the other sentences.
- "Ada was initially conceived as an Umbrella researcher named Linda" is supported by ref 48, while ref 47 support the rest ๐BP!๐ (๐) 14:04, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Can I ask for a quote on #48?
- Replaced it into Bloody Disgusting as a source just in case you're gonna doubt about it since I cannot access to that book. Bloody Disgusting still confirm that Ada was linda in the early concept, which it says that Linda was renamed as Ada in the final version. Jo-Jo Eumerus ๐BP!๐ (๐) 12:19, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Can I ask for a quote on #48?
- "Ada was initially conceived as an Umbrella researcher named Linda" is supported by ref 48, while ref 47 support the rest ๐BP!๐ (๐) 14:04, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- 50 Don't have access.
- It's in the end of game's credit scene. ๐BP!๐ (๐) 14:04, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- 54 Seems like we can't verify this until the webarchive works again.
- It just supports her appearance in the "Separate Ways". Thats it. ๐BP!๐ (๐) 14:31, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- 56 Don't have access.
- Download it at libgen website. ๐BP!๐ (๐) 14:31, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Library Genesis seems questionable, legally speaking. I am a little uncomfortable with sourcing something to pirated text. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:06, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oops sorry for suggesting you about this as a source reviewer. I was able to download/receive books from other users after making request at resource. I've already emailed it to you the ref 56 and ref 72 book pages. I used Ref 56 so that I can claim her outfit as "red slit dress". ๐BP!๐ (๐) 16:48, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- 'fraid that the emails did not include any content. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:31, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Jo-Jo Eumerus its in the second email. I already emailed you again for 3rd time now. ๐BP!๐ (๐) 12:14, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- OK, got it now. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:04, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Jo-Jo Eumerus its in the second email. I already emailed you again for 3rd time now. ๐BP!๐ (๐) 12:14, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- 'fraid that the emails did not include any content. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:31, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oops sorry for suggesting you about this as a source reviewer. I was able to download/receive books from other users after making request at resource. I've already emailed it to you the ref 56 and ref 72 book pages. I used Ref 56 so that I can claim her outfit as "red slit dress". ๐BP!๐ (๐) 16:48, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- 60 Don't have access.
- For you to see at twitter [9] ๐BP!๐ (๐) 14:25, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Not sure why that would be a reliable source, and it only supports part of the sentence. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:06, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Removed ๐BP!๐ (๐) 16:47, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- 61 OK
- 72 Don't have access.
76 OK
Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:51, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Jo-Jo Eumerus made a comment.
If you can't access books then you download it from libgen website for free.About books, I was able to borrow/receive them from anotherr user via email after requesting at resource. Can I maybe take a screenshot and email it to you??? ๐BP!๐ (๐) 14:04, 12 October 2024 (UTC)On 10 and 24, can I have a second pair of eyes? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:05, 12 October 2024 (UTC)- @Jo-Jo Eumerus about ref 24, this was the content fron a separate ways Ive taken to that website.
GI: Letโs talk about Separate Ways. Was this your idea? How it all come about?
. I ended up removing the ref 10 and 40 aswell due their source problem I guess, its a Japanese full text and it might be a questionable source while archive org is still down. I've also already emailed it to you the ref 56 and ref 72 book pages. I used Ref 56 so that I can claim her outfit as "red slit dress". ๐BP!๐ (๐) 17:17, 12 October 2024 (UTC)Kawata: Actually while we were thinking about the game itself we realized that the development time was actually very long and we wanted to add something to the game more than just porting it. We wanted to really add something to the game and one of the things we realized was that Ada shows up in the game later but you donโt know much about her and sheโs a very strong character and she deserves to really stand out in the game. So we really wanted to give her that side story in order to let her stand out the way she should have in the game
- @Jo-Jo Eumerus can you update? ๐BP!๐ (๐) 11:59, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Jo-Jo Eumerus about ref 24, this was the content fron a separate ways Ive taken to that website.
- Jo-Jo Eumerus made a comment.
- Thank you for the source review User:Jo-Jo Eumerus. @FAC coordinators: It seems like everything have been strucked and finished now (His final concern has been addressed [10]. ๐BP!๐ (๐) 09:09, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Support from Panini!
[edit]I workshopped some of this article with (if your username were to be shortened, would you rather be called just "Boneless" or just "Pizza"?), including a peer review. My main gripe was the reception section, but this recent version is written very wonderfully, with its detailed critical opinions and comparisons to stereotypes and popular genres. I'm not a character guy, but I think you nailed it; really! My other concerns have been picked up prior to FAC. I Support this article. Panini! โข ๐ฅช 21:40, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Ada is hired by an unnamed organization to steal the G-virus mutagen developed by the Umbrella Corporation, a pharmaceutical company responsible for a zombie outbreak in the fictional American metropolitan area of Raccoon City. I really like this summary in particular
- Thanks for being sincere(if my username were to be shortened, I think it would be best to be called "Boneless" or just "BP" lol), that summary was made/copyedited by JokEobard wonderfully. ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 21:55, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Support from Shooterwalker
[edit]I had a chance to re-read this article. It was already very close not long ago. It has improved significantly, and I can support the prose as being featured quality. Great work. Shooterwalker (talk) 20:45, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Support from Kung Fu Man
[edit]Tossing my support, but two suggestions with one purpose: I feel the note section is unnecessary:
- It should be fine to include the nihongo in the lead per other article. While I recognize Jill deviates from that, it's kind of an exception.
- For the Dead by Daylight reference, there's really no need to make a special note for the Resident Evil crossover, as others such as Knives Out came out years after the game's release also. Simply putting the reference itself in place of the note should suffice.
With these two small changes, the notes section can be removed for easier reading.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 02:11, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi. Done ๐Boneless Pizza!๐ (๐) 04:33, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
Support from Tintor2
[edit]Just like in the previous nomination, I think Boneless Pizza did a good work with Ada but I think he improved on it thanks to the fact the article provides more coverage about her other appearances like the making of the character.Tintor2 (talk) 15:02, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FAC/ar, and leave the {{featured article candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Gog the Mild (talk) 20:02, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.