Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Guild homeHow to copy editTemplatesBarnstarsParticipantsCoordinators
RequestsDrivesBlitzesMailing listNewsletters

Note: this page is automatically archived using YiFeiBot_2; completed requests are archived after 24 hours. Manual archiving is normally unnecessary. Please check and fix incorrect codes, missing timestamps, etc. For more information, please see the bot request page. – Baffle gab1978 (talk)

Guild of Copy Editors' requests page

On this page, you can request that the Guild of Copy Editors copy-edit specific articles.

Instructions for requesters

To make a request, remove any existing {{copy edit}} tags from the article, then click this button and follow the instructions:

Please remove any existing {{copy edit}} tags from the article to avoid edit conflicts during the copy edit.

Please note:

  • No request by an unregistered editor will be accepted unless the IP has done significant work on the article. Drive-by IP requests already on the list may be declined by any editor.
  • The average waiting time is two or so months. Please be patient and feel free to improve your requested article while you wait.
  • If you plan to nominate the article for good article, A-class or featured article status, please wait until the copy edit is complete before nominating it.
  • Having your article copy edited by our team does not guarantee that the prose will be considered acceptable during any of the above reviews.
  • You may have up to two open requests at any one time. This is enforced so that every request can have a fair chance of being fulfilled within a reasonable period.

Requests may be declined if the article is:



November 2024

[edit]

Second request. For GAN. Thanks Amir Ghandi (talk) 10:52, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would like some copyediting done to fix any unclearness or poor wording in the prose. For a future renomination for GA (GAN). Thanks. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 14:45, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Current GA which I plan to take to FAC in the new year. Would appreciate any and all notes as I have no experience in the FAC process. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 21:07, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FA from 2008 that hasn't run on the main page (TFA) and could use a strong copy-edit. Harizotoh9 (talk) 05:31, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Working Baffle☿gab 06:14, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FA from 2009 that has also not run on the main page. Appears quite stable but it would be nice if the article has a copy-edit before running on the main page (TFA). Harizotoh9 (talk) 05:31, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Working Moritoriko (talk) 01:56, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have asked Moritoriko about the progress of this request on their talk page. Baffle☿gab 07:08, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I recently did an overhaul and a brief copyedit of my own. I just want to make sure there are no errors in the article, so am requesting a copyedit please.Cltjames (talk) 12:28, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I put this article up for GAR which failed and the reviewer recommend I seek assistance here. I think it's possible I have read this article too many times to be of much assistance. Czarking0 (talk) 18:24, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Working I'll try my best! 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 03:26, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

[edit]

Old FA article that I recently made changes to. Would appreciate a copyedit. Thanks in advance. LittleJerry (talk) 22:21, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically, the story section would benefit from the input of someone experienced with plot summaries, but any other changes of course more than welcome. I plan to bring this to good article status (GAN). Jonathan Deamer (talk) 09:38, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another old article I worked on years ago but never bothered to have it copyedited. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 00:05, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Old FA. I recently added some more text. Would appreciate a copyedit. Thanks in advance. LittleJerry (talk) 00:06, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Currently a GAN on hold. Per the reviewer request of putting this article up on GOCE.KjjjKjjj (talk) 15:40, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Episode plot summary makes little sense to those who haven't watched the series. A possible GAN. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 17:33, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just expanded from sandbox. Will nominate for GA (GAN) in the near-future but I plan to go for FA (FAC) in the long run. Erick (talk) 06:28, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of expansion has been done to the article for the last three months. I intend to bring it to GA (GAN) if it's good enough. Thank you. – Yolo4A4Lo (talk) 10:57, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article translated from ru.wiki. I would like to nominate it for featured article (FAC) as article is complete, but my English grammar is not too good. Sławobóg (talk) 14:45, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recently promoted FA. But, I want to make sure there we aren't missing any grammar lapses and typos since I added a tad bit more. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 22:38, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another NGE article. For a future GAN.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 07:42, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possible GAN. A peer review has been done to this article, and I think another round of copyediting would help. The Cadillac Ranger (talk) 01:53, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As part of an initiative to improve articles about key Shia figures, this particular article has recently undergone a major revision. Before nominating it for GA (GAN), I'm asking for your help to further improve the prose. Thanks! Albertatiran (talk) 15:10, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GAN: content-wise this is ready, but am having trouble making it read clearer, especially in Background and recording and composition; would like to see someone else give this a shot at writing. // Chchcheckit (talk) 14:02, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, that's my first time writing an article in english, so i'm not so used to the grammar. The FAC failed and Skyshifter recommended to come here. BernaBotto (talk) 15:39, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've reviewed the article in its current version and didn't spot anything that needed fixing from a copyediting POV. It looks from page history like BernaBotto attempted some large changes and then the changes were reverted back to the status quo ante, so I'm not sure there actually is anything to do at this point. BernaBotto, can you specify if there's particular issues outstanding that you're aware of or if this request is now moot? (I'll leave a note to this effect on BB's talk as well). Fluffernutter (talk) 18:16, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article is in need to be copyedited. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 13:26, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For possible FAC. Pamzeis (talk) 15:23, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Has patchy prose. Needs strong grammar correction. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:13, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I reviewed the article and edited it for grammar and clarity. Eliza Manning (talk) 00:10, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Underwent a major rewrite due to a FAR/FARC; this was also requested by Boneless Pizza! (talk · contribs) on my talk page. Xeroctic (talk) 10:03, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Potential for GAN.Tintor2 (talk) 17:54, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]