Jump to content

Wikipedia:Cleanup/Archive 7

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1←Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10
Listings from 2012

2012

December

Added wikilinks through the letter 'J', then I had to take a break. Leschnei (talk) 01:30, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

November

  • Poor man's copyright – This article is full of original uncited research. Would benefit from a complete work-over to make sure what is said is factually backed. 12:57, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Lensman series – A long article that lacks appropriate inline citations. The plot section would benefit from abbreviation, and the article contains too much unsourced fancruft information. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:19, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Rongpa – This article about an Indian village would benefit from being edited for content, context, and formatting. While informative, it lacks citations.
  • Australian Army Cadets – To much information. The article is somewhat spammed with excess information which can be deemed as irrelevant to the general public. Sources not states throughout the majority of the article.
  • Toonami (Asia) This Article is about an upcoming television channel in South-East Asia. Help me to match it with Wikipedia Wiki Verification.
Article removed. 4DHS (talk) 06:25, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
I removed the strike-out that was previously in place for this article above; the article exists (appears to have been recreated) and remains in need of work. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:31, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Do you have any sources you could provide that would suggest this claim? 4DHS (talk) 06:49, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

October

  • Letter of credit – Much uncited material. Confusing. Self-published sources. It's difficult to find good sources; Google searches turn up Investopedia, sites promoting various financial products, "standby letter of credit" scams, and other junk sources. It's a real topic, but probably needs to be cited to some offline book. This needs attention by a financial professional. John Nagle (talk) 04:56, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
  • UVB-76 – It was ok before but recently editors have been adding information about the station's day-to-day business which is really not that interesting or notable and reads more like a logbook than an article. CodeCat (talk) 12:14, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Puffed grain – No inline citations. 3 Further reading section entries exist that may possibly be usable to improve the article. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:26, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
 Fixed: Looks to be cleaned up. Entries of events seem relevant and informative. Kobuu (talk) 15:38, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Pizza delivery – Lead requires expansion. Needs more inline citations per "citation needed" tags.
Nearly 3x length of lead. Could still use some work, but much better than what it was. ComfyKem (talk) 18:26, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 Fixed: Article is clean of tags. Still needs content. Kobuu (talk) 15:38, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
 Fixed: Article is clean of tags. Kobuu (talk) 15:38, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Sicilian pizza – Would benefit from expansion. Has exactly one source as of this post.
The article's sourcing has been improved, and it has been slightly expanded. Northamerica1000(talk) 23:58, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
— Northamerica1000(talk) 13:54, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Almost completely rewritten. — Hex (❝?!❞) 10:30, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

September

— Above posted by Northamerica1000(talk) 20:18, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

August

July

  • Bondo (putty) Generally sloppy. Only one citation. Very biased tone. Information about the product is very limited and does not include information about other products in the Bondo line (fiberglass filler, plastic filler, etc.) or any history on the brand. Not much information on how it works or why it is used (it is also extensively used for sculpture and modification of consumer goods). Doesn't even contain a link to the product web page. Chrisbrl88 (talk) 09:56, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 – I added a few sources to the article. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:47, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
 – The layout has been cleaned-up, and the article has been copy-edited to reduce promotional tone. Northamerica1000(talk) 20:44, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

June

 – cleaned up.--jcnJohn Chen (Talk-Contib.) RA 03:59, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 – Cleaned up. Northamerica1000(talk) 19:52, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
 – Layout is cleaned up. Still needs work. Northamerica1000(talk) 14:22, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

May

 – Cleaned up the layout. The article still needs more sources. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:38, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Raw water - Cleanup required, several links just copied in and written to sound like an advertisement.
 – The article has been cleaned-up by other users and in some edits I have done. The article would still benefit from more sources. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:58, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 – The article has been cleaned up. It would still benefit from copy editing and better organization. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:45, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

April

 – Was merged to Saga of the Skolian Empire. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:49, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Chicago Bulls - Needs major work, clean up and improvement so it could be and reach good article status. JamesCarter05 (talk) 5:56, 18 April 2012 (CT)
  • Fruit snack – Unreferenced. No sections. Needs copy editing; may contain original research.
 – The article has been cleaned up. However it could still be reviewed and have more references.Moony22(talk) 20:39, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
  • General Motors Diesel – Lede section needs expansion. Unreferenced. History section would benefit from better organization and subsections.
  • Hotel manager – Primarily in list format; conversion to prose would be an improvement. Unreferenced. Could use better organization.
  • Landry's Restaurants – Would benefit from page layout cleanup and copy editing. Primarily in list format; conversion to prose would be an improvement.
  • Market Theatre (Johannesburg) – Could use page and image layout cleanup. Unreferenced.
 – Cleaned up. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:59, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Roland Rat – Needs better organization into sections. Has bare urls and needs more sources.
 – The above 6 entries were posted by Northamerica1000(talk) 08:26, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
I like the idea of cleaning up this - if no one else is going to I'll take a look over the next few weeks (will take me a while to do it right)-- 🍺 Antiqueight confer 12:23, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Metabolic window - Very badly constructed and poorly written. Sources listed by last name in the article, but not present in Notes or References section. Looks like the original writer wrote one thing and someone else "updated" it contradicting the original. It's just sloppy. Milhisfan (talk) 09:26, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
 – Cleaned up. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:45, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 – The article has been cleaned up as of the time of this post. It would benefit from further copy editing. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:43, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 – Cleaned up. A long article with 500 inline citations at this time. The article would still benefit from copy editing. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:35, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

March

  • Burton upon Trent I just looked at this article and did a bit of rearranging, but I think it's struggling a bit and could do with some help. This could be a really great article but at the moment it's pretty weakly written and lacks some research. Thought I'd draw some people's attention to it. Kaleeyed (talk) 18:11, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 – Cleaned up. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:32, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Anticuchos – No references. Would benefit from copy-editing and better organization.
  • Anti-social behaviour – Could use copy-editing for cohesion and to clean-up grammatical choppiness. Needs more references.
 – Cleaned up. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:10, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Cabinet of Bangladesh – “Functions” section in list format; would benefit from conversion to prose. Only one reference, and no inline citations.
 – Cleaned up. Needs more citations and copy editing. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:07, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Hair museum – Needs expansion; has seven listed sources that could be used to expand the article with inline citations.
 – Cleaned up.
  • K L University – Article would benefit from copy-editing for cohesion; prose is choppy. References section needs copy-editing. Article needs more inline citations
 – Cleaned up. Could still use more sources and copy editing. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:56, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Madison Symmetric Torus – Article has only one reference, would benefit from copy-editing, and may contain original research. The article would also benefit from some reduction and better summarization of technical information. Bare URLs need cleaning-up.
  • Occupy Ottawa – Needs more references and inline citations. Could use better organization and copy-editing for cohesion. Currently has no images.
 – Cleaned up. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:59, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Pan-American Conference – Tables need layout formatting and clean-up. Only has one reference/inline citation. No assigned WikiProjects on talk page.
  • Salal Hydroelectric Power Station – Primarily in list format; conversion to prose would improve the article. References section needs copy-editing. Needs inline citations.
  • Ukrainian culture – Art section is very long, somewhat choppy, would benefit from copy-editing and formatting. Other areas are also choppy; consolidation of information into paragraphs would be an improvement. Article has many empty sections that need to be populated with sourced information. Bare URLs need cleaning up. Needs more references and inline citations.
—The above 12 posts are from Northamerica1000(talk) 10:17, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
 – I've done some preliminary clean-up to the page's layout and added the "expert attention requested" template. Northamerica1000(talk) 04:11, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

February

  • The Sopranos: The whole article is unbelievably laboured throughout. Extent of content in Info' box has been discussed previously, and has been debated extensively but to no avail, thanks to the aggressive participation of non-registered IPs. Suggest partial protection before attempting editing on this article. A project on which I would then be more than pleased to participate.
--- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 11:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Have you tried requesting protection at WP:RFPP? -- Ϫ 02:04, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

I have just put in a request for Temporary semi-protection. I should like to thank El duderino, and everyone else who has helped on The Sopranos since 25 February 2012 (UTC)--- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 10:45, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection:
Persistent sockpuppetry. Repeated deletion of sourced material by new editors. Persistent vandalism. I have had help from the Wikipedia:Cleanup Project (since February 25) and I should welcome your help in maintaining this article. Thank you, Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 11:06, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jayjg (talk) 03:36, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
 – Added a reference:
—"China National Tea Museum". China.org.cn. October 15, 2011. Retrieved February 17, 2012. {{cite web}}: External link in |publisher= (help) (Includes text and video). Northamerica1000(talk) 20:52, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
 – The link China National Tea Museum is functional as of the time of this post. Northamerica1000(talk) 10:40, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Rail transport in Russia – Lede is short. Tagged for tone and neutrality issues. Information could be better-organized into sections and subsections.
  • Rail transport in Queensland – Lede is very short. Much content is in list format; conversion to prose may benefit the article. Additional inline citations are needed.
  • Bank of Hawaii – History section is very choppy, could use organization and consolidation into paragraphs. Most of the article is within its "History" section; better organization with new sections may be an improvement. Much of the content is missing inline citations.
 – Added lede to the article. Northamerica1000(talk) 18:45, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Quarantine technology – Unreferenced. Citations and clarification needed. Primarily in list format; conversion to prose may be an improvement. Article tagged as providing insufficient context.
  • Duane Hagadone – Lede is very short. List formatting could use conversion to prose.
  • Halton Hills Public Library – Some sections are very long without any inline citations, could use some reduction. Article has no inline citations. "Assets" section could use rewriting to clarify the content.
  • Hai Sing Catholic School – Prose is choppy, much of the article is in list format, which may be better as prose. The verifiability of the article is tagged as disputed. Unreferenced as of this post.
—Northamerica1000(talk) 0:55, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

*Jeanie Johnston - "Personal communication" as a reference. Would someone please look at (and probably revert) this edit of Jeanie Johnston [1] I would explain that <ref>{{Personal communication, Aiseanna Mara Teoranta}}</ref> is not acceptable, (and it is tagged as such), but in the light of the reason given for the changes: (I reverted some of user Lugnad's changes, as he or she deleted withouth comment several unfavourable, but researched and sourced facts about the ship. Also fixed some typos.) It might be better received from someone other than I. Just to add, I have no idea what changes of mine are being referred to. Thanks, Lugnad (talk) 11:34, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for responding Lugnad (talk) 18:31, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
I've chopped the pers. comm. ref and claim. Bet it comes back. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:51, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Open University of Sudan - A user that seems to be related to this university added lots of content. First I've rollbacked it, than I've replaced and fixed it as a minor layout copyedit. All this content is related to this university and may be useful but I still have the doubt that it's wroten as a sort of Brochure. --Dэя-Бøяg 21:23, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 – Information very likely copied and pasted, or written verbatim per University literature has been removed. The article is now a stub. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:00, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

January

 – The article appears to be cleaned up as of this post. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:44, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 – The article appears to be cleaned up as of this post. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:40, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
  • 1984 in organized crime – No lede section. Empty "births" section. Unreferenced. Needs more references. Would benefit from summaries preceding the list information in its sections.
 – Added a lede sentence. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:57, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Early classical guitar recordings – No lede section. Some of the content in the "History of early classical guitar recordings" section may be better rewritten in a list format.
 – Added a lede sentence. Northamerica1000(talk) 16:03, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Eco Marine Power – An article about a company that develops and markets environmentally friendly power and propulsion systems for ships and other vessels. The article is tagged as written like an advertisement, could use some rewriting. I added a few references to the article, which could be used for more inline citations.
Update: The article has been cleaned up. It would still benefit from copy editing. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:46, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Cleanup/Archive_7&oldid=1138433491"