Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/JJMC89 bot 8
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was
Approved.
Operator: JJMC89 (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 10:52, Saturday, January 21, 2017 (UTC)
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic
Programming language(s): Python
Source code available: replace.py on GitHub
Function overview: Replace {{Don't edit this line {{{machine code|}}}|{{{1}}} with {{Don't edit this line {{{machine code|}}} in taxonomy templates.
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): WP:BOTREQ#Tidy taxonomy templates (permalink)
Edit period(s): One time run
Estimated number of pages affected: Up to 19,772
Exclusion compliant: Yes
Already has a bot flag: Yes
Function details: Replace {{Don't edit this line {{{machine code|}}}|{{{1}}} with {{Don't edit this line {{{machine code|}}} in taxonomy templates.
Discussion
[edit]- Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. — xaosflux Talk 15:51, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Trial complete. 49 edits and skipped {{Taxonomy/Acacia}}. — JJMC89 (T·C) 19:14, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Approved for extended trial (250 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Please do one more batch to give anyone time to complain if they see any problems. — xaosflux Talk 05:14, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- Trial complete. 250 edits — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:40, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Xaosflux and JJMC89: as the trial was completely successful (I monitor the taxobox error tracking categories and nothing appeared), could this be completed now? Peter coxhead (talk) 12:15, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Approved. Task approved. — xaosflux Talk 04:54, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.