Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twelve Oaks
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Davewild (talk) 11:39, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The article is not notable, and has no references to verify its contents. As such, it is just a repetition of various plot facts from the Gone With the Wind movie article, and is totally duplicative of those articles. Judgesurreal777 22:04, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep it's not the plot, it's the setting. There are enough books and articles about GWTW to source it easily enough. Sourceable is sufficient to avoid deletion.DGG (talk) 02:16, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- There is nothing encyclopedic about it, and it is just repetition of the plot of Gone with the Wind. As there is no commentary of any kind from an outside perspective, it is totally unencyclopedic to have an article of just unsourced plot repetition. Look around, you wont find any policies supporting that. Judgesurreal777 21:42, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 18:47, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOT#PLOT, adds nothing to the GWTW articles. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 19:33, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per DGG. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 00:09, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The last paragraph of this article is not a plot summary and it is from an outside perspective. This is a location that appears in both one of the best-selling books and most popular films of all time. Two minutes on Google Books is all it takes to find references [1] [2]. I have added 2 references to the article. Bláthnaid 11:53, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.