Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pinstripes
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Xclamation point 02:47, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The Pinstripes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Not notable, only reference is of citybeat which does articles on 100's of local bands each year 74.129.0.221 22:11, 18 February 2009 (UTC))[reply]
- Delete - Obvious failure to meet WP:BAND. How many ska bands are there in London anyway? Unrelated to the AfD itself, someone should talk a bit more forcefully to User:RasterFaAye, whom I see has a habit of de-PROD-ing articles without much explanation or effort to improve them, as this particular case. §FreeRangeFrog 22:26, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I only deprod a small number of articles, and often for procedural reasons. Those I do deprod, I do so because I believe deletion is not uncontroversial. RasterFaAye (talk) 22:33, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Judging from your talk page, I disagree. And deletion is rarely uncontroversial, which is why there's a process built around consensus for it. Anyway, this is hardly the place to discuss it. §FreeRangeFrog 23:09, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It does make for some interesting reading though. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 02:14, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Not uncontroversial delete, fails notability per WP:MUSIC. Searching pulls up no reliable, third-party, sources. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 02:14, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: no significant 3rd party sources WP:BAND. JamesBurns (talk) 05:53, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - they may become notable in the future but not there yet. A single local paper article isn't enough to establish notability -- Whpq (talk) 19:37, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.