Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Haryana Chess Association

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The one person arguing to keep didn't give any policy-based reasons to support their argument. If somebody wants to work on this, ping me on my talk page and I'll get it moved to draft space. -- RoySmith (talk) 04:55, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Haryana Chess Association

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable organization. Tagged for insufficient sources since March, 2015, none provided. Quick check for sources only reveals passing mentions, no real coverage. TransporterMan (TALK) 18:42, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:06, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:06, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:58, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Searches found nothing better than some News passing mentions. Notifying past users David Biddulph and Justlettersandnumbers. SwisterTwister talk 07:00, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Don't Delete - This is a NGO in haryana affiliated by All india chess federation under the aegis of FIDE (world chess federation). All they doing is promoting chess. it has also been recognized by Govt of India. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.180.170.105 (talk) 07:07, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe so but what's needed here is better coverage from sources such as news, magazines and journals. If wished, this can be drafted and userfied so you can work with it until actually notable and acceptable. SwisterTwister talk 07:11, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I just don't know what to think about this; we have this article, and another on Haryana Chess Association (now very understandably prodded by TransporterMan). Both appear to use the same logo, neither at the moment appears to be notable. But it may be that most of the coverage is in a language that I can't read. Pinging Titodutta for comment on that. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:44, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, clpo13_(talk) 09:39, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:39, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.