Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunheri Nagin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 22:08, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sunheri Nagin

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability guidelines. Sources are blogs. Okoslavia (talk) 20:13, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Before does not revealing anything. Okoslavia (talk) 20:14, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:34, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If considered insufficiently notable in itself, redirect to Helen (see here or in [1]). But it may be notable in itself!-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 21:10, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 03:22, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I similarly can find no evidence of notability. StereoFolic (talk) 03:36, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is support for a Redirect.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:25, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A work lacking an adequate amount of sources that could support its notability. The term "adequate" is generous. -The Gnome (talk) 17:44, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No standalone notability under WP:NFILM. I don't think it's obvious that we should redirect this to Helen (actress); why not any other notable actor who was involved here? I think it's much better to have nothing here, rather than a redirect, per WP:R#DELETE#10: [A redirect should be deleted] if the redirect could plausibly be expanded into an article, and the target article contains virtually no information on the subject. To me, it's quite plausible that someone digs up some obscure reviews or other sources on this film and writes an article out of them. Redlinks encourage article creation, or so we assume. No redirect, please. Actualcpscm^{scrutinize, talk} 19:59, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.