Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sprunt Architects

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sprunt Architects

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:CORP since it has seemingly not received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Per WP:AUD, "attention solely from local media, or media of limited interest and circulation, is not an indication of notability; at least one regional, statewide, provincial, national, or international source is necessary." Even the most reliable references provided (e.g., Architects' Journal) are no more than "media of limited interest and circulation". Lincolnite (talk) 13:50, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, I've not nominated this article for AfD before now because they claim a couple of awards. However, the Green Guardian award is minor and the RIBA East award appears to be for a design by Sweden's White Arkitekter, with Sprunt acting as the locally based executive architects. Outside of the odd mention in the Architects' Journal I can't see any significant general news coverage about Sprunt. Fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. Sionk (talk) 14:21, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.