Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sor Piseth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Per G5 ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 16:43, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sor Piseth

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article of a Footballer that fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG Inter&anthro (talk) 22:06, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Regards, Inter&anthro (talk) 22:08, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. Regards, Inter&anthro (talk) 22:08, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment most if not all of the sources in this article do not even refer to Sor Piseth, but to Um Vichet. Inter&anthro (talk) 22:11, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 November 7. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:20, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. The article may also be WP:G5 eligible as there is an ongoing sockpuppet investigation into the articles creator. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:52, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:52, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 08:08, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.