Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaheen Airport Services (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Shaheen Foundation. MBisanz talk 02:27, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- Shaheen Airport Services (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No in-depth coverage found. Fails WP:NCORP. Greenbörg (talk) 13:04, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Delete/Merge to Shaheen Foundation The original AFD, back in 2008 when I assume that the criteria was less stringent (I wasn't around then), this was judged as 'keep, but verify'. After nine long years, it has not yet been verified. No one can say it has not been given time. A merge to its parent company seems appropriate; the only reason I hesitate is because I am unconvinced of the notability of Shaheen Foundation. MartinJones (talk) 13:57, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:45, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:45, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:45, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Delete, article fails WP:CORPDEPTH. The parent article Shaheen Foundation doesn't appear to pass WP:CORPDEPTH either. Ajf773 (talk) 18:41, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.