Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seina Tsukimori

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 02:49, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seina Tsukimori

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources here: Deprecated source, Instagram posts, interview. Online is slightly more promising, but come down to press releases/promotional pieces. TLA (talk) 03:07, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, Advertising, Fashion, and Japan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I am not a "field expert", but these does not appear to be any real 3rd party coverage; ample evidence she exists, is a model, and has appeared in things, but that's it, apart from a personal "my hobbies" type of bit. I note that the WP:ja page has more references, but a number are marked "not valid reference", and the page is marked as problematic. Imaginatorium (talk) 07:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This is the only news coverage I could find, I'm unsure if it's a RS [1]. A search of .jp websites doesn't bring up much beyond social media, blogs or e-commerce sites. Oaktree b (talk) 15:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not a Wikipedia policy expert here, but I can tell that the article doesn't meet the notability criteria. The writer is literally forced to use instagram as a citation... Even the jpwiki version is flagged as
- Personal research
- Lacking citations
- Not notable
Probably the best to delete and see if she meets notability criteria in the next few years or so...

(AlphaBetaGammsh (talk) 02:12, 16 January 2024 (UTC))[reply]
Weak Delete. While I don't have any confidence in my ability to find Japanese sources that might not be cited yet in the article, nothing in the text or proffered sources suggests that better sources exist or that she is otherwise notable yet. Eluchil404 (talk) 01:04, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.