Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scroll Trench

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Apart from the author Garry Denke, nobody supports keeping this article. Sandstein 05:33, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Scroll Trench

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have no reason to believe this exists under this name. There may be a trench that meets some of the description (ignoring the geology) but it does not appear to be significant and certainly not discussed in reliable sources under either name. It is however widely publicised on the web by the article's creator, see for instance [www.voy.com/92635/471.html this forum post]]. I know the creator of the article (see also their last edit just before mine) well from off-Wiki as an extremely prolific poster whose edits are (trying to be polite here) basically fantasies. This old version of his talk page provides an example of his style. Dougweller (talk) 11:30, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Scroll (Arc) Trench of Stonehenge (UK) duly Filed and Recorded in Deed Records and Official Public Records of Archer, Baylor, Hampshire, Wiltshire, (etc) County courthouses (Just to name a few); Therefore any such re-Publication of said Scroll (Arc) Trench of Stonehenge (UK) hereinat Wikipedia not required. Thank you. Garry Denke 01:00, 20 July 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Garry Denke (talk • contribs)

Delete If it even exists, there's no way a single feature could be notable enough for its own article. joe•roe^t•c 17:22, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Other than Doctor Garry Denke's (1622-1699) eastern 8 ft (2.4m) vertical Core-cutting of it (Scroll Trench: 1656), and Colonel William Hawley's (1851–1941) western 9 ft (2.7m) horizontal Cross-section of it (Scroll Trench: 1923), no other Physical evidence of it exists; Therefore the Wikipedia article unnecessary. Maps: [1] Sections: [2] Thank you. 76.184.189.94 (talk) 12:24, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is the article's creator, Garry Denke, editing logged out and evidently agreeing to the deletion. Dougweller (talk) 12:27, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I don't believe so, I believe it's a delete !vote from a different IP user, possibly a SPA. -- 202.124.72.158 (talk) 23:13, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hound Lord over Foxhole Trench opens Scroll — Master of Foxhound — the Creator Garry Denke 08:22, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Office of Works, now Department for Culture, Media and Sport (Secretary): Jeremy Hunt; National Trust for Places of Historic Interest or Natural Beauty (Board of Trustees): Simon Jenkins, Sir Laurie Magnus Bt, Patrick Casement, Sir Crispin Davis, Richard Farrant, Sir Edward Greenwell, Charles Gurassa, Nichola Johnson, Sir Mark Jones, Adrian Phillips, Michael Quicke, Mary Villiers; Historic Building and Monuments Commission for England (Chair): Baroness Kay Andrews; (Commissioners): Lynda Addison, Maria Adebowale, Joyce Bridges, Manish Chande, Sir Barry Cunliffe, David Fursdon, Ronald Hutton, Jane Kennedy, John Walker, Elizabeth Williamson; (Chief Executive): Simon Thurley; (Executive Directors): Mark Pemberton, Edward Impey, Deborah Lamb, Keith Harrison; not interested in obtaining a satisfactory examination. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.184.189.94 (talk) 13:10, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Pip pip. Jolly good. Cheerio. Garry Denke 13:55, 22 July 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Garry Denke (talk • contribs)

Delete No evidence of notability. No Google News, Google Books, or Google Scholar references, except ones derived from Wikipedia. -- 202.124.72.158 (talk) 23:06, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.