Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott C. Evans
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The claims of him being CEO was an exaggeration, and there is a lack of significant coverage. Fences&Windows 23:51, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Scott C. Evans (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:BIO the only in-depth coverage is in a private newsletter from his school. Toddst1 (talk) 15:01, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and recommend early close per nom - nothing out there to indicate notability. Hazir (talk) 15:05, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep CEO of CREF is notability--considering the importance of the company--as judged by the amount of assets managed: $300 Billion. See the G News archive search: [1] DGG ( talk ) 21:49, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 01:25, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I was all ready to say "keep" when I saw the claimed title "Chief Executive Officer of TIAA-CREF." Then I went to the TIAA-CREF website and found out, IT ISN'T TRUE. He is Executive VP for asset management, yes, but he is NOT the CEO - he is fourth down the line in the executive chart. Any time I find a bio with a false claim in it, I tend to say "delete" just on general principles. --MelanieN (talk) 04:46, 2 December 2009 (UTC)MelanieN[reply]
- I've removed that blatant bit of misinformation from the article. Toddst1 (talk) 06:08, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - now the false claim is removed there is no notability. JohnCD (talk) 10:47, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.