Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saroj Maharjan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 22:56, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Saroj Maharjan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Needed more citation and the ref link is dead. SeytX (talk) 22:56, 14 February 2018 (UTC)~~ — Striking per WP: SOCKSTRIKE. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:46, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. PRehse (talk) 23:58, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Has not competed at the highest level. Does not meet WP:MANOTE.PRehse (talk) 00:07, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:33, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:33, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Coverage fails to meet WP:GNG. His sole appearances at the Asian Games and World Championships both resulted in first round losses to competitors who lost their next fight. It could be argued that competing at a world championship meets WP:NSPORT, but in the past it's been determined that some success (such as at least making the quarter-finals) is required (at least in martial arts). I don't believe that it's reasonable to claim that all 871 competitors at the 2011 World Judo Championships (an annual event) are automatically notable. Papaursa (talk) 22:15, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nominator has been blocked as a sock. A stronger consensus is therefore required.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 05:46, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

delete Agree with Papaursa's analysis.Sandals1 (talk) 15:50, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- I've indef blocked Sandals1 as an obvious sock. Brand new users don't immediately dive into AfD unless they're socks. -- RoySmith (talk) 19:36, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, and I can't find any coverage of him on Google, so fails WP;GNG. TimTempleton ^(talk) ^(cont) 22:53, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.