Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quiet party

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Party or an appropriate section thereof Star Mississippi 03:07, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quiet party

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced and apparent orphan page. Seems non-notable and perhaps obscure commerical events without any wider social impact. Seaweed (talk) 20:01, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment the best source I can find is [1], but I'm not entirely convinced this source is entirely unprompted by the company that is the main subject of the article. Every other relevant Google hit seemed non-independent, web-pages of companies who host quiet discos. If we can't find genuine unconnected secondary sources, perhaps it's WP:TOOSOON? Elemimele (talk) 20:50, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It looks like this article had this other article merged into it. On that revision there are several links to reliable sources covering quiet parties, including non-trivial coverage in The New York Times and SFGATE. Those references should be edited into this article. I do agree that the concept seems not to have caught on, so a merge into a new "variants" section on Silent disco could work too. Barnards.tar.gz (talk) 21:13, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Party. The concept doesn't have the traction in sources or popular media for a standalone article. There are plenty of niche parties discussed at the parent article. Desertarun (talk) 14:54, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:43, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Meets GNG per above sources from old redirect. Including additionally from that same redirect a USA TODAY article—siro χ o 00:50, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Party#Types as a new L3 section, I guess. I don't think silent disco works as a target; the parties discussed there all involve some form of performance entertainment experienced through headphones, which seems like a pretty distinct concept. On review of the sources mentioned above, while I can't deny that this formally satisfies the GNG, from a practical standpoint I just don't see much in them to build an article out of. They are mostly about first- and second-hand experiences of attending a Quiet Party. (And what citable facts these articles contain relate mostly to what seems to have been a business/hustle run by Rebhan and Noe -- note mention of "franchising" in one article -- which raises a different set of issues.) We are, I think, missing several levels of coverage around both silence and parties that would have provided better merge targets -- wouldn't it be lovely if we had Partying in the 2000s? -- but Party is already eclectic enough that this is probably fine there. -- Visviva (talk) 23:21, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to party per Visviva as a more appropriate location for this content. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 01:20, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Party#types per above. - Indefensible (talk) 01:51, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.