Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prijesh Kannan (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 09:48, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Prijesh Kannan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Restarted attempt at profile listing again immediately after the last deletion and nothing here convinces our policies are both satisfied and then also satisfied for substance; the history explained this was only meant as a personal listing since there were no attempts to change it to a better convincing article. As it is, such a "specific subject" is questionable since it's open to either payment for such claims or otherwise questionability. SwisterTwister talk 03:53, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

only one Guinness and rest is just a sequence of that, this is clearly a page meant for Self promotion, this does not pass the criteria for entry in Wikipedia. Its also surprising that How this page is published since such a long period without get noticed. my vote for deletion of this page Anu214 (talk) 12:09, 18 January 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anu214 (talk • contribs) 04:09, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 07:26, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 07:26, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:18, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, f eminist 03:25, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Subject may not meet the Wikipedia's notability criteria; in fact it is pointing towards Subjects notable only for one event. In addition, in the previous Afd discussion @Revent: sensed and mentioned about the COI which should also be considered. — Sanskari ^Hangout 16:00, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The sources are not good enough and it seems like a generally low profile person who got a one time coverage for an event. BLP1E in my opinion. In addition, it is clear that the intent is to promote the subject, so it can be deleted under WP:NOTPROMO as well. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 17:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.