Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peg DHCP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to April Fools' Day Request for Comments#List of April Fools' RFCs. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 05:42, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Peg DHCP

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

vanity article. Graywalls (talk) 01:57, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 01:57, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 01:57, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 01:57, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to April_Fools'_Day_Request_for_Comments#List_of_April_Fools'_RFCs, where it is mentioned. I'm not sure that vanity is a reason for deletion. While most RFCs are considered standards, I was unable to find secondary sourcing for this RFC. Basic facts, such as its existence and date of publication, are verifiable in multiple sources in GBooks. I could believe that this is a plausible search term, so a redirect that places this half-serious RFC in context seems a reasonable way forward. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 10:37, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jack Frost (talk) 06:33, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per Mark viking. All April Fools' RFCs are well-known in the tech world, and redirects are cheap. Elizium23 (talk) 06:59, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.