Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Original Adult Video
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0[talk] 04:37, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neologism. As noted in the talk page, there is at least one person who has lived in Japan and never heard this. Likewise, I was stationed there for a number of years, and I've not heard of this; I've also consulted a few other friends who've lived there (including a couple of Japanese natives) and they profess not to have heard of this either. Mitsukai 22:49, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete This is an obvious hoax. "AV" does mean adult video but OAV is OAV. Ashibaka tock 23:26, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- There seems to be enough general confusion on this that I don't think it is a hoax on the part article author. —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-15 01:06Z
- It's still a hoax on somebody's part. Ashibaka tock 02:46, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Heh, maybe :) The hypothesis in the webpage I linked below says: OAV was the original term used by the anime industry, but since it was so similar to "AV", some people in Japan got confused and linked OAVs with adult videos. In response, anime companies adopted OVA as the industry standard acronym instead of OAV (though some places still use OAV, I think). If that is true then there may have been no bad faith on anybody's part. Anyway we agree on the deletion of the article so no big deal. —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-15 13:39Z
- It's still a hoax on somebody's part. Ashibaka tock 02:46, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- There seems to be enough general confusion on this that I don't think it is a hoax on the part article author. —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-15 01:06Z
- Delete as untrue as explained in this article. Extensive explanation at [1] [2]. , OVA article could touch on the naming issue. —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-15 01:04Z
- Delete as hoax. -- Krash 16:22, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete. There is no truth to this article at all. --nihon 18:25, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as unverifiable. Stifle 22:52, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.