Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olivia Fox Cabane (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) -- Dane2007 ^talk 02:36, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Olivia Fox Cabane

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The author of a single book is not notable separately from the book. We normally have a choice of making the article on the book or the author. At this point, I think the book is the more notable. DGG ( talk ) 00:41, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I found this 2009 WSJ article about the subject, an interview of her at the Economist from 2012, a Business Insider interview also from 2012, and a bunch of other stuff, pretty quickly. It seems that there's enough coverage from independent reliable sources over a long period of time that establishes notability. The previous nomination actually makes the case for keeping much better than I ever could. LAroboGuy (talk) 01:37, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:37, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:38, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 16:56, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – The subject meets WP:BASIC / WP:AUTHOR. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:53, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

Keep Seems like a clear keep per the above, Sadads (talk) 04:41, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, re nom's reasoning - "The author of a single book is not notable separately from the book.", of course a (very) notable exception (untill recently) is Harper Lee. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:51, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, meets WP:AUTHOR and WP:GNG, large number of sources available as i set out in the previous afd, not all of which only review here book, but do discuss the author, who is also known for her motivational work. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:13, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.