Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nickarth

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 14:34, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nickarth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any real sources about this person, in any language. The WV Chronicle hasn't actually published anything since 1918, this iteration is some SEO nonsense. MusicTalkers, etc...are unreliable and also blackhat SEO spam as are the other language sources. Everything that would be considered "reliable" (which is really stretching it) are press releases, which aren't independent. Praxidicae (talk) 13:49, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:53, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Macedonia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:55, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Mostly self-generated PR junk. I removed too many to count that were non-RS press releases and the like. GNG fail.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 23:52, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: It's really a shame that we have to wade through all this trash that marketing/SEO agencies pay to publish and try to pass off as legitimate journalism. I really feel sorry for all the true journalists out there, it cheapens their life's honest work.. Honestly, it cheapens the work of this artist, too. I suspect their work is worth a lot more than this. I had stronger language to use, but thought it better to leave it at this. Waggie (talk) 03:04, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete — no in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources. Celestina007 (talk) 04:45, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.