Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nadine Winnebeck
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Shimeru (talk) 19:39, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Nadine Winnebeck (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod. Non-notable author, failing WP:AUTHOR. Also lacks reliable sources andy (talk) 15:47, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This time, for a change, it was not me who deprodded it--in fact, I had placed a prod2. A The only published book is self-published on lulu.com. The article claims "considered as classical, intellectual works of literature." when they are in no libraries, because nobody has published them, is something I do not understand. DGG ( talk ) 15:58, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete self-published author (lulu.com) Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:14, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: She was mentioned once in the third largest newspaper in Finland as potentially dating some Finnish dude. This has led to forum threads discussing who she is and why she is dating said Finnish guy. That is the extent of her "coverage." I doubt this can gather a single keep vote since she's self-published.--Milowent (talk) 16:30, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:25, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails all criteria for WP:AUTHOR. Only books appear to be self published on lulu.com.--Savonneux (talk) 19:37, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.