Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matrix of Leadership (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Autobot. – sgeureka ^t•c 19:40, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Matrix of Leadership

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This still fails to establish notability, so fails WP:PLOT, WP:WAF. and WP:GNG. Sources in the previous AfD were passing mentions. None were ever added to the article. TTN (talk) 18:49, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 18:49, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 18:49, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 18:49, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Autobots as fancruft that fails WP:GNG. Can be explained sufficiently in the Autobot article._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 20:57, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think the article Autobots will survive for very long. JIP | Talk 14:18, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete/redirect; fails WP:GNG and is mostly WP:FAN. lullabying (talk) 22:42, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails GNG. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:21, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Autobot It would be impossible to make a valid article on this subject, as there are no reliable sources that meaningfully discuss this subject. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 10:43, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fictional, usual-variety fancruft. Fails GNG/NFICTION.Kacper IV (talk) 12:32, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Autobot. It's a reasonable search term and this target contains sufficient information on the topic. Argento Surfer (talk) 17:56, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is a fictional piece of technology unlikely to be looked up. I looked at the references for Autobot and saw that they are pretty much all primary. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 18:15, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @Knowledgekid87: The page has been viewed over 2,000 times in the last month, with about 70 views per day. It's hard to say how many of those were direct searches rather than internal links, but it's more than zero. The proposed target would also not be immediately obvious, even to some users familiar with the term. Argento Surfer (talk) 18:59, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.