Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MIL-DTL-13486

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:58, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MIL-DTL-13486

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article should be deleted because it is about a military standard of little impact outside of military purchasing specifications. It has been tagged for notability for a couple of years with no improvements to suggest it has encyclopediac value here. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. There are military standards for everything armed forces buy, and few of them are notable outside of their baliwick. This standard is obscure outside of those working in manufacture of wire or in military purchasing. Wtshymanski (talk) 02:46, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The only sources cited are (1) an archived web page which had been sponsored by a wire and cable company (see WP:VENDOR), and (2) an archived Department of Defense website on which I can't find any information about this specification. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:08, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:39, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTCATALOG. Not notable. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 09:21, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Hawkeye Nick-D (talk) 10:27, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No indicia notability. -Ljleppan (talk) 10:39, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete obscure military spec, non-notable for our purposes here. No sources found. Oaktree b (talk) 14:53, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.