Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M.B. Nash (Jurassic Park character)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:10, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- M.B. Nash (Jurassic Park character) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable fictional character who played a bit-part role in a Jurassic Park film. Clearly fails WP:N. – Toon(talk) 16:22, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable, and non-referenced. Thanks, Genius101Guestbook 17:31, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:59, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete One-time character in a not particularly notable film, who may only deserve articles in very unusual circumstances (which are not given here). Unlikely search term. – sgeureka t•c 08:37, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- How can you possibly call the film non-notable? The film meets all inclusion criteria and it is part of a notable franchise. - Mgm|(talk) 10:58, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable character. Trivial clutter at best. No notability shown. RobJ1981 (talk) 19:16, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as not even notable in his own Universe. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 22:35, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 02:01, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This particular character had no lead part and also no part that was important to the plot. Utter trivia at best. - Mgm|(talk) 10:58, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.