Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucky Logan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#A10. (non-admin closure) Mr. Magoo (talk) 23:19, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lucky Logan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Topic already covered in the article Logan Lucky, which is the correct title NathanielTheBold (talk) 23:11, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:21, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I tagged the article for speedy deletion. --Cavarrone 06:44, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Close AFD as I agree that under an incorrect name, the newer article duplicated the information of the older... both authored by Captain Assassin!. Sorry Captain, you need to check your contributions before writing new articles on topics you've already contributed. I have speedy deleted it per WP:A10. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 21:11, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Please notice that WP:A10 applies to articles "where the title is not a plausible redirect". We may want to put aside the fact that Lucky Logan was started by the editor who started Logan Lucky, but we may conversely see it as added proof that Lucky Logan is a plausible redirect title. A search for "Lucky Logan" -"Logan Lucky" reveals that Variety used the title Lucky Logan in February, and that multiple other sources have used it since. Hence, as Alternatives to deletion suggests, deletion was not required, as a plausible redirect could have been boldly created per WP:ATD-R, categorized as a {{R from modification}} and {{R unprintworthy}}. Pinging collaorators (NathanielTheBold—Cavarrone—Captain Assassin!—MichaelQSchmidt). — Sam Sailor 14:42, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.