Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Metal Men enemies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 05:41, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Metal Men enemies

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:OR without independent sources or any justification of the notability of the group. Fails other policies about what Wikipedia is not, such as "Wikipedia is not a directory". Jontesta (talk) 17:24, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Jontesta (talk) 17:24, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation and Lists. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:39, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - There are no sources that I can find that give significant coverage to the Metal Men's enemies that would allow this to pass WP:LISTN. Very few of these entries link to articles, because most have zero notability. Could possibly Redirect to Metal Men#Enemies, but given that the title is an unlikely search term and it does not appear that anything currently redirects to this list, I don't see that as being really necessary. Rorshacma (talk) 19:43, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge with their section at Metal Men in the spirit of WP:PRESERVE. --Rtkat3 (talk) 23:28, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Based on what sources, exactly? Rorshacma (talk) 00:08, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever sources any source hunters on this website can find. Plus, the person who created this list page is currently inactive last time I checked. If nobody finds one, my decision is still merge. --Rtkat3 (talk) 00:43, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Rorshacma. WP:BEFORE didn't show me a lot of sources. I wouldn't object to a partial merge if that WP:ATD emerges as a consensus. But that's really hard when a lot of these fail WP:V. Shooterwalker (talk) 16:38, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 19:06, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above consensus. A completely unnecessary list with no indication of notability. Above keep/merge arguments show no merit, as there is no information that needs preserving here. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 22:37, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.