Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lágrima Ríos

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Improvements seem to have addressed the initial concerns. Joyous! | Talk 00:37, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lágrima Ríos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Completely unsourced biography of a singer who may or may not have a valid claim of notability per WP:NMUSIC. Apart from the basic statement that she existed as a singer, all of the other content here is biographical trivia and none of it actually addresses her career at all -- which means the article doesn't actually say anything that one could even measure against NMUSIC. I'm certainly willing to withdraw this if somebody can get it up to snuff with an actual notability claim and the actual reliable sourcing required to support it, but nothing here entitles her to keep this. Bearcat (talk) 20:35, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pruned and sourced. What do you reckon? --Andreas Philopater (talk) 22:27, 10 November 2016 (UTC) --Andreas Philopater (talk) 13:30, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:28, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Uruguay-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:27, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:27, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:46, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.