Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ko-c

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 14:05, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ko-c (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:ADMASQ article on a Non notable rapper who doesn’t satisfy any criterion from WP:MUSICBIO and in general lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. Furthermore a before search turns up nothing but hits in self published sources, user generated sources and unreliable sources which have 0 reputation for fact checking or possess editorial oversight. Celestina007 (talk) 20:38, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:38, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:38, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:38, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - The nominator is correct on unreliable and self-promotional sources. This article is a totally typical entry in the trend of unknown African rappers trying to include Wikipedia in their promotional strategies. "Rose to prominence" is typical prose in this type of entry, and in this case it's false because Ko-C has a whopping two songs in five years. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 15:16, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:48, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.