Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin L. Walker (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:49, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin L. Walker

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this article does not meet WP:NACTOR criteria for inclusion. A PROD nomination was removed by the author (who appears to have a COI based on contribution history, promotional tone, and off-wiki activity) with the reason "has appeared in multiple notable films". He has starred in one, but mere appearances in others don't mean much. The numerous sources in the article aren't coverage of the person, they are coverage of a recent film, giving trivial mentions to the person. Or they are primary sources (interviews and such). This fellow may be up-and-coming, but up-and-coming doesn't merit a Wikipedia article. ~Amatulić (talk) 14:16, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Lots of references here but none of them appear to be reliable -- even if they were, there's nothing in them to establish notability, per @Amatulic:. A Train^talk 15:31, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:53, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:53, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:53, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:18, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:27, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:PROMO with a touch of WP:TNT. This is strictly a vanity page with an overabundance of links to notable entities, in an apparent attempt to inherit notability from them. The tone is over the top, and this article should be promptly deleted. Possibly Salt as the article was previously deleted (in 2011). K.e.coffman (talk) 05:12, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Blatant over the top promotion. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:27, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Salt as this article has shown enough to suggest, regardless of improvements, none would actually be substantial and convincing, the works listed are trivial and anything else added is simply attempting to mirror and sugarcoat it. SwisterTwister talk 00:04, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.