Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Marshall Mulreed Fairley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 06:34, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

John Marshall Mulreed Fairley

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blatant autobio. Is the guy actually notable? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:53, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you, the page should be deleted. I just searched up John Marshall Mulreed Fairley and the dude is some normal guy and NO he is not notable. He’s just some plain dude. Check on the internet for those who don’t concur. Cheers!-- Allied Rangoon‧talk 23:01, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 23:33, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

-Did this guy really even work with all of these companies? Wgolf (talk) 01:36, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tell you what. He did do some I must admit but he's not famous. He's not significant.--Cheers!-- Allied Rangoon‧talk 02:08, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:40, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:40, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:40, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. His twitter feed can't really help to establish notability. I agree that it looks like this just some guy. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:15, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 00:11, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Seems to be quite a few references in Google, but nothing that comes close to WP:RS. And that's assuming Google didn't fill the search results with "suggested" articles for people with related names. This one could probably be speedy. --CNMall41 (talk) 16:05, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.