Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaghana
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Transwiki. MBisanz talk 03:08, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Jaghana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Probably should be translocated to wiktionary Shadowjams (talk) 10:27, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- See my comment on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Auparishtaka. - Mgm|(talk) 12:33, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 00:00, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Abecedare (talk) 08:25, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- As stated on Auparishtaka, transwiki and we'll talk. --Alinnisawest,Dalek Empress (extermination requests here) 22:59, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Xclamation point 06:38, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree with the others, copy over to wikitionary and then list as redirect. Chaldor (talk) 08:25, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki Seems pretty open and shut. SNOWBALL? Computerjoe's talk 11:59, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.