Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hold On (Name Taken album)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 17:53, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Hold On (Name Taken album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable album. No references, except for a piece of trivia from about.com. All I can find are a couple of mediocre reviews on sites of questionable reliablity[1][2]. Pburka (talk) 04:49, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 05:15, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep
This is the band's most notable release. Other than their 2003 split EP with the notable band Bayside, who have an extensive discography, I am in favor of deleting the rest of their discography. But their single album is definitely of note in the punk community. I will add more reviews for it and the split EP.
WP:AVOIDCOI Sweetmik (talk) 01:20, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Refs to additional reliably-sourced substantial coverage has been added to the article. There's also evidence of a respectable audience for the albums: last.fm reports 425,000 listens to the album, "Panic" off the album has 169,000 YouTube listens, "Control" has 255,000 listens. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 21:35, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, causa sui (talk) 18:16, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.