Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hammad Husain

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus that the individual is not notable under any of the possibly applicable criteria Nosebagbear (talk) 20:00, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hammad Husain

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable Pakistani architect. He was interviewed by a couple of papers when he was working for the President, but that does not make him pass GNG MistyGraceWhite (talk) 19:49, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable architet.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:52, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:52, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:52, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:52, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I was convinced for a brief second that the subject might be notable because on their linkedin they claimed to be the Dean of the School of Architecture at "Republic University College". But turns out that's a for profit school that the subject actually co-owns. Just pointing this out so someone doesn't go down the same rabbit hole as me. As such, subject fails WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG. A couple of quotes in articles is not enough. Sulfurboy (talk) 22:28, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, Sulfurboy has made some valid arguments. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 23:35, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I agree. The only notability that this individual seems to have is via a brief political association. Overall, he doesn't appear to cross the line in terms of our guidelines for who is or isn't really notable. I'm also inclined to think that deletion is the right call. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 00:01, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:PROF and WP:MILL. Small, for-profit college presidents are not automatically notable. We are a charity, not a free wen host. Bearian (talk) 02:26, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.