Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HR Aaqib Hameed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete - simple nn bio case. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:44, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

HR Aaqib Hameed

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A speedy delete was removed by a new account (two edits) so I am nominating it for AFD as non notable. Slatersteven (talk) 13:28, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note this was previously deleted as [[1]].Slatersteven (talk) 13:32, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The 1st reference from a notable & ranked website is added the tag should be removed Gpstudio13 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:37, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt that is enough to establish notability, so lets keep the AFD going to allow others to chime in.13:45, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

I also note serious copyright violations that copies at least three sources word for word.Slatersteven (talk) 13:49, 4 March 2018 (UTC) The article is written with the help of those references and it is not a copyright issues as news are mostly same with matching words Gpstudio13 (talk)[reply]

It is if we copy it word for word.Slatersteven (talk) 13:55, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK If I re write that article into my own wordings then I hope no issue of copyright and tag will be also removed it notablity is enough Gpstudio13 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:57, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You mean these were not your words?.Slatersteven (talk) 13:58, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I mean that I have got whole content from news and just reformatted it .Now I have written the whole article myself Gpstudio13 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 14:11, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The person is notable in the province and article is frin . I think it should not be deleted Hammad61 (talk) 14:14, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article is about a person that is working for peace in pakistan . I suggest that AFD should be removed and article should be locked Baberjohn785 (talk) 14:18, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Possible sock, I suggest deletion, and salting.Slatersteven (talk) 16:23, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stalersteven. The article is now done so I request you to remove AFD Tag from it ... Gpstudio13 (talk) 14:20, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As I said he still needs to pass our notability requirements, which the new sources do not do (and I would hope you can figure out why I say this).Slatersteven (talk) 16:23, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 14:39, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 14:39, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There are no sources to indicate the subject is notable. All I can see are a bunch of social media mentions and videos. MT Train^Talk 14:56, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails GNG. I suggest the titles be salted. --Saqib (talk) 15:53, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think a speedy delete as both created by a banned user and the fact that the "second" speedy delete tag was removed by one of his socks.Slatersteven (talk) 16:48, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. I have marked it for speedy deletion. Let's not waste time the time of community members on such AfDs. --Saqib (talk) 17:05, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt variant spellings: I see nothing to overturn the previous AfD consensus from 3 March 2018. Fails WP:BASIC. AllyD (talk) 07:57, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.