Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Godsbane

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of Forgotten Realms deities#Intermediate deities. So Why 09:31, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Godsbane

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability is not established. TTN (talk) 13:31, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 13:33, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per nom. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 13:41, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge to List of Forgotten Realms deities#Intermediate deities (under "Mask"). BOZ (talk) 15:31, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- not notable. There's nothing to merge as the article does not cite 3rd party sources. Sources listed are all in-universe publications and do not help establish notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:43, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:53, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per BOZ and WP:ATD-M. I'll note that K.e.coffman's opinion is not policy based, in that primary sources are perfectly acceptable to verify uncontroversial content; they just don't count towards notability. Jclemens (talk) 05:18, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Question -- what do Keep / Merge voters intend to merge? The article offers no citations, let alone to independent RS. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:05, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and WP:FANCRUFT and the tone of WP:OR due to the exclusive use of primary sources, though I wouldn't object to a small mention being merged into List of Forgotten Realms deities#Intermediate deities or The Avatar Series. - GretLomborg (talk) 16:17, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.